Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3021 - 3030 of 12913 for prosecuting.
Search results 3021 - 3030 of 12913 for prosecuting.
State v. Elbert Whitelaw
1 and November 2, 1993. The prosecution stated that it intended to prove finger/vaginal intercourse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8630 - 2005-03-31
1 and November 2, 1993. The prosecution stated that it intended to prove finger/vaginal intercourse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8630 - 2005-03-31
State v. George R. Bollig
to sentencing, so long as the prosecution has not been substantially prejudiced by the reliance on the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14338 - 2005-03-31
to sentencing, so long as the prosecution has not been substantially prejudiced by the reliance on the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14338 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher Anson
statement. The State also asserted that the prosecution witnesses were so credible that Anson had no choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6537 - 2005-03-31
statement. The State also asserted that the prosecution witnesses were so credible that Anson had no choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6537 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene P. Opalewski
was not prosecuted but, in the latter, he was prosecuted, was convicted, and served a prison term. ΒΆ11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4170 - 2005-03-31
was not prosecuted but, in the latter, he was prosecuted, was convicted, and served a prison term. ΒΆ11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4170 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
represented that her agreement not to prosecute was approved by the investigating agency in Iron Mountain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208408 - 2018-02-13
represented that her agreement not to prosecute was approved by the investigating agency in Iron Mountain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208408 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
State v. Terron Napper
eyewitness testimony was central to the prosecution's case. She testified that the sound of gunshots woke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8364 - 2017-09-19
eyewitness testimony was central to the prosecution's case. She testified that the sound of gunshots woke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8364 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Barbara E. Harp
on September 23, 2004. The prosecution called Kleist, who testified that on May 16, 2003, Harp worked as her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20087 - 2017-09-21
on September 23, 2004. The prosecution called Kleist, who testified that on May 16, 2003, Harp worked as her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20087 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of that statute must be prosecuted before the victim reaches the age of twenty-six years. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485574 - 2022-02-22
of that statute must be prosecuted before the victim reaches the age of twenty-six years. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485574 - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
State v. William Napper
eyewitness testimony was central to the prosecution's case. She testified that the sound of gunshots woke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8365 - 2017-09-19
eyewitness testimony was central to the prosecution's case. She testified that the sound of gunshots woke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8365 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for exercising his First Amendment rights, which appears to be a retaliatory prosecution claim. In the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980102 - 2025-07-03
for exercising his First Amendment rights, which appears to be a retaliatory prosecution claim. In the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980102 - 2025-07-03