Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3021 - 3030 of 12952 for prosecuting.
Search results 3021 - 3030 of 12952 for prosecuting.
State v. Jeffrey A. Cobb
to the district attorney for prosecution. The State concedes that Cobb was denied a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8453 - 2005-03-31
to the district attorney for prosecution. The State concedes that Cobb was denied a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8453 - 2005-03-31
[MS WORD]
CR-232: Order for Exemption under 948.13(2m)
. Distribution: 1. Court 2. District Attorney (who prosecuted the case) 3. Petitioner/Petitioner’s Attorney CR
/formdisplay/CR-232.doc?formNumber=CR-232&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-12-01
. Distribution: 1. Court 2. District Attorney (who prosecuted the case) 3. Petitioner/Petitioner’s Attorney CR
/formdisplay/CR-232.doc?formNumber=CR-232&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-12-01
State v. Jeffrey C. Gilman
. He argues that the prosecution breached the plea agreement, but we conclude he waived that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12900 - 2005-03-31
. He argues that the prosecution breached the plea agreement, but we conclude he waived that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12900 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
facility and the assistant district attorney who prosecuted Hohol as defendants rather than the final
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99850 - 2013-07-21
facility and the assistant district attorney who prosecuted Hohol as defendants rather than the final
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99850 - 2013-07-21
State v. Anthony Hicks
in this case, because the defendant cannot be prosecuted for being in possession of cocaine without a tax stamp
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16950 - 2005-03-31
in this case, because the defendant cannot be prosecuted for being in possession of cocaine without a tax stamp
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16950 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eric E. Erdos
event, Erdos was not prejudiced by the trial court's ruling. The State prosecuted Erdos on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8555 - 2017-09-19
event, Erdos was not prejudiced by the trial court's ruling. The State prosecuted Erdos on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8555 - 2017-09-19
State v. Eric E. Erdos
. The State prosecuted Erdos on the basis of its allegation that he knowingly violated a child support order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8555 - 2005-03-31
. The State prosecuted Erdos on the basis of its allegation that he knowingly violated a child support order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8555 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
assault prosecution the trial court withheld sentence and placed Armstrong on probation for eight years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28364 - 2007-03-07
assault prosecution the trial court withheld sentence and placed Armstrong on probation for eight years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28364 - 2007-03-07
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey C. Gilman
. He argues that the prosecution breached the plea agreement, but we conclude he waived that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12900 - 2017-09-21
. He argues that the prosecution breached the plea agreement, but we conclude he waived that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12900 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tony M. Smith
court's sentencing decision, but whether the prosecution complied with the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8414 - 2005-03-31
court's sentencing decision, but whether the prosecution complied with the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8414 - 2005-03-31