Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3021 - 3030 of 12891 for prosecuting.
Search results 3021 - 3030 of 12891 for prosecuting.
State v. William Napper
, Smith's eyewitness testimony was central to the prosecution's case. She testified that the sound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
, Smith's eyewitness testimony was central to the prosecution's case. She testified that the sound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger L. Warren
under § 946.31(1)(c), Stats., be brought as a single count or as a single "unit of prosecution." See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15005 - 2005-03-31
under § 946.31(1)(c), Stats., be brought as a single count or as a single "unit of prosecution." See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15005 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and because the risk of bias was high in light of the fact that the ALJ, the prosecuting attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52859 - 2010-08-02
and because the risk of bias was high in light of the fact that the ALJ, the prosecuting attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52859 - 2010-08-02
State v. Darrin E. Parnell
clause. The confrontation clause provides "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15999 - 2005-03-31
clause. The confrontation clause provides "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15999 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for exercising his First Amendment rights, which appears to be a retaliatory prosecution claim. In the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980102 - 2025-07-03
for exercising his First Amendment rights, which appears to be a retaliatory prosecution claim. In the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980102 - 2025-07-03
State v. Eugene P. Opalewski
was not prosecuted but, in the latter, he was prosecuted, was convicted, and served a prison term. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4170 - 2005-03-31
was not prosecuted but, in the latter, he was prosecuted, was convicted, and served a prison term. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4170 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of that statute must be prosecuted before the victim reaches the age of twenty-six years. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485574 - 2022-02-22
of that statute must be prosecuted before the victim reaches the age of twenty-six years. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485574 - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
represented that her agreement not to prosecute was approved by the investigating agency in Iron Mountain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208408 - 2018-02-13
represented that her agreement not to prosecute was approved by the investigating agency in Iron Mountain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208408 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
State v. Terron Napper
eyewitness testimony was central to the prosecution's case. She testified that the sound of gunshots woke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8364 - 2017-09-19
eyewitness testimony was central to the prosecution's case. She testified that the sound of gunshots woke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8364 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, then prosecution under subd. 1. “for intentionally neglects” would duplicate a prosecution under subd. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286064 - 2020-09-09
, then prosecution under subd. 1. “for intentionally neglects” would duplicate a prosecution under subd. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286064 - 2020-09-09