Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30271 - 30280 of 62063 for child support.
Search results 30271 - 30280 of 62063 for child support.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel was ineffective by failing to obtain the preliminary hearing transcript to support Greer’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737488 - 2023-12-07
counsel was ineffective by failing to obtain the preliminary hearing transcript to support Greer’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737488 - 2023-12-07
CA Blank Order
at the small claims hearing, we must assume that every fact essential to support the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100727 - 2013-08-12
at the small claims hearing, we must assume that every fact essential to support the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100727 - 2013-08-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for lost business revenue of $2,552.65 supported by an accounting service’s itemization of the store’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521435 - 2022-05-17
for lost business revenue of $2,552.65 supported by an accounting service’s itemization of the store’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521435 - 2022-05-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the trial court failed to ascertain the existence of a factual basis supporting Quinonez’s pleas. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93566 - 2014-09-15
the trial court failed to ascertain the existence of a factual basis supporting Quinonez’s pleas. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93566 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the verdict, supports the jury’s decision. BACKGROUND ¶2 Steffek was charged with endangering safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143711 - 2017-09-21
the verdict, supports the jury’s decision. BACKGROUND ¶2 Steffek was charged with endangering safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143711 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sufficient to support the convictions; and (3) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785759 - 2024-04-09
was sufficient to support the convictions; and (3) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785759 - 2024-04-09
State v. David G. Maddox
that if injury includes physical pain, the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6094 - 2005-03-31
that if injury includes physical pain, the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6094 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not supported by the record.” Specifically, Thomas contends that “[i]t is clear that the court viewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=469840 - 2022-01-11
not supported by the record.” Specifically, Thomas contends that “[i]t is clear that the court viewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=469840 - 2022-01-11
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
for revocation and the facts supporting the previous alternative to revocation. At the sentencing hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95391 - 2014-09-15
for revocation and the facts supporting the previous alternative to revocation. At the sentencing hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95391 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was not probable cause to support his arrest for operating while intoxicated and that regardless, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76641 - 2014-09-15
that there was not probable cause to support his arrest for operating while intoxicated and that regardless, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76641 - 2014-09-15