Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 58479 for speedy trial.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 58479 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Harrison Franklin
. No. 99-2871 2 Franklin was denied effective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16178 - 2017-09-21
. No. 99-2871 2 Franklin was denied effective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16178 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
CURLEY, P.J. Brian Stecker appeals the trial court’s order reducing the amount of and continuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35652 - 2014-09-15
CURLEY, P.J. Brian Stecker appeals the trial court’s order reducing the amount of and continuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35652 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14).[1] He asserts that, in his trial for first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144308 - 2009-10-27
for postconviction relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14).[1] He asserts that, in his trial for first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144308 - 2009-10-27
Rosemary Owen v. Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company
with Society's insured, John Hajewski. Society requests (1) a new trial due to various discovery and evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9723 - 2005-03-31
with Society's insured, John Hajewski. Society requests (1) a new trial due to various discovery and evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9723 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rosemary Owen v. Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company
(1) a new trial No. 95-2644 -2- due to various discovery and evidentiary errors; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9723 - 2017-09-19
(1) a new trial No. 95-2644 -2- due to various discovery and evidentiary errors; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9723 - 2017-09-19
Wendy Pero v. Donald Lucas
placement of his son William.[1] He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25088 - 2006-06-27
placement of his son William.[1] He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25088 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relief. First, Dengsavang claims his trial counsel was ineffective for: (1) opening the door
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168980 - 2017-09-21
relief. First, Dengsavang claims his trial counsel was ineffective for: (1) opening the door
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168980 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wendy Pero v. Donald Lucas
of his son William. 1 He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25088 - 2017-09-21
of his son William. 1 He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25088 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jimmy D. Lamon
his motion for a new trial. No. 95-2393-CR -2- Lamon argues (1) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9596 - 2017-09-19
his motion for a new trial. No. 95-2393-CR -2- Lamon argues (1) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9596 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jimmy D. Lamon
a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial. Lamon argues (1) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9596 - 2005-03-31
a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial. Lamon argues (1) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9596 - 2005-03-31