Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3061 - 3070 of 29721 for des.
Search results 3061 - 3070 of 29721 for des.
[PDF]
Eleanor Delach v. County of Price
. The interpretation of an unambiguous contract is a question of law we review de novo. Schlosser v. Allis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14249 - 2014-09-15
. The interpretation of an unambiguous contract is a question of law we review de novo. Schlosser v. Allis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14249 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Anna M. Rasmussen v. Larry D. Rasmussen
to seek work on the alternate weekends when the children were with Larry. Both parties sought de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11540 - 2017-09-19
to seek work on the alternate weekends when the children were with Larry. Both parties sought de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11540 - 2017-09-19
2011 WI APP 2
. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58086 - 2011-01-30
. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58086 - 2011-01-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
-RESPONDENT, V. DE-YUL THAMES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from judgments and orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34788 - 2014-09-15
-RESPONDENT, V. DE-YUL THAMES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from judgments and orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34788 - 2014-09-15
Laona State Bank v. State
decide de novo. See State v. Bender, 213 Wis.2d 338, 341, 570 N.W.2d 590, 592 (Ct. App. 1997). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13053 - 2005-03-31
decide de novo. See State v. Bender, 213 Wis.2d 338, 341, 570 N.W.2d 590, 592 (Ct. App. 1997). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13053 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Ruffin, 2022 WI 34, ¶35, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 974 N.W.2d 432. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542422 - 2022-07-13
. Ruffin, 2022 WI 34, ¶35, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 974 N.W.2d 432. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542422 - 2022-07-13
[PDF]
Laona State Bank v. State
is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Bender, 213 Wis.2d 338, 341, 570 N.W.2d 590, 592
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13053 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Bender, 213 Wis.2d 338, 341, 570 N.W.2d 590, 592
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13053 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jennifer L. Sheppard v. William P. Jensen
, and we decline to make Jennifer a de facto partner. We affirm the circuit court’s ruling that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7171 - 2017-09-20
, and we decline to make Jennifer a de facto partner. We affirm the circuit court’s ruling that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7171 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Fontaine Baker
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4253 - 2017-09-19
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4253 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 127
as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s ruling on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101998 - 2017-09-21
as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s ruling on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101998 - 2017-09-21