Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3061 - 3070 of 29942 for des.
Search results 3061 - 3070 of 29942 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
exists is also a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 In determining that the easement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93997 - 2013-03-11
exists is also a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 In determining that the easement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93997 - 2013-03-11
Royal C. Neumann v. Town of Waukesha
of a conditional use permit for a commercial PUD in a residential district was a “de facto rezoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7816 - 2005-03-31
of a conditional use permit for a commercial PUD in a residential district was a “de facto rezoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7816 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review the court’s decision de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI App 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771763 - 2024-03-07
review the court’s decision de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI App 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771763 - 2024-03-07
Laona State Bank v. State
decide de novo. See State v. Bender, 213 Wis.2d 338, 341, 570 N.W.2d 590, 592 (Ct. App. 1997). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13053 - 2005-03-31
decide de novo. See State v. Bender, 213 Wis.2d 338, 341, 570 N.W.2d 590, 592 (Ct. App. 1997). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13053 - 2005-03-31
Department of Regulation & Licensing v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
, due weight deference, and de novo review. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis.2d 274, 284, 548 N.W.2d 57, 61
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12091 - 2005-03-31
, due weight deference, and de novo review. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis.2d 274, 284, 548 N.W.2d 57, 61
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12091 - 2005-03-31
Robert Schmitz v. Fire Insurance Exchange
of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7547 - 2005-05-09
of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7547 - 2005-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
is de novo. See id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185, 717 N.W.2d at 3. ¶12 Williams argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122805 - 2014-09-29
is de novo. See id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185, 717 N.W.2d at 3. ¶12 Williams argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122805 - 2014-09-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
forth in the relevant statutes is a question of law, which we review de novo. Coston, 222 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379752 - 2021-06-22
forth in the relevant statutes is a question of law, which we review de novo. Coston, 222 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379752 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be resolved on our de novo review, based on undisputed facts, of the circuit court’s decisions to reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052004 - 2025-12-18
be resolved on our de novo review, based on undisputed facts, of the circuit court’s decisions to reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052004 - 2025-12-18
[PDF]
WI APP 78
. STAT. §§ 340.01(9r) and 343.307(1)(d). Our review of what they require is de novo. See Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64184 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. §§ 340.01(9r) and 343.307(1)(d). Our review of what they require is de novo. See Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64184 - 2014-09-15