Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30621 - 30630 of 59342 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] Jose-Manuel Raneda v. Bank of America, N.A.
it, including a videotape of his deceased father, was not returned to him. His complaint claimed trespass
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5547 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of Watertown v. Jeffrey M. Wagner
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5354 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
life. See § 48.415(6). There would be no arguable merit to an appellate claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171040 - 2017-09-21

State v. Walter T. Missouri
seeking a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Missouri claims: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21670 - 2006-04-25

[PDF] State v. Derrick L. Madlock
the State’s claim of waiver. The State argues that Madlock waived his right to raise the issue on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Denettria J.
dispositional order being annually extended. The petition claimed two grounds for terminating Denettria’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20860 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 23
in favor of the State of Wisconsin, her employer, with regard to her wage claim. Magnussen asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504240 - 2022-06-08

Mark B. Watts v. The Medical Protective Company
a judgment dismissing medical malpractice claims against the physicians who treated Vicky and their insurers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14992 - 2005-03-31

2011 WI APP 23
decision on Kuhnert’s claim. Anderson determined that Kuhnert’s position was not overtime exempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58834 - 2011-02-15

Wisconsin Professional Police Association v. Oneida County
owed a total of $650.40. ¶16 The association’s claim that the arbitrator’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2266 - 2005-03-31