Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30641 - 30650 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 30641 - 30650 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
Willie Hampton v. Jose T. Lloren, M.D.
employee for acts committed in the discharge of the employee’s duties “unless the claimant complies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11409 - 2005-03-31
employee for acts committed in the discharge of the employee’s duties “unless the claimant complies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11409 - 2005-03-31
Edward M. Moran v. Property Management Concepts
with its duty under these provisions and a reasonable exercise of its authority. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7403 - 2005-03-31
with its duty under these provisions and a reasonable exercise of its authority. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7403 - 2005-03-31
Dillard Earl Kelley, Sr. v. State
of the circuit court as well as deputy clerks performing duties within the office of the clerk of circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5319 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court as well as deputy clerks performing duties within the office of the clerk of circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5319 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
performing her prior duties at the same pay rate but for only eight hours a week. Brosman declined the offer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102111 - 2013-09-24
performing her prior duties at the same pay rate but for only eight hours a week. Brosman declined the offer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102111 - 2013-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
official misconduct and neglect of duty, as allowed under s. 73.03(3), and other statutes, please see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39679 - 2009-08-17
official misconduct and neglect of duty, as allowed under s. 73.03(3), and other statutes, please see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39679 - 2009-08-17
Alexander L. Jacobus v. State
ambiguity, it is our duty to give the language its ordinary meaning. Id. at 225-26, 496 N.W.2d at 179
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8266 - 2005-03-31
ambiguity, it is our duty to give the language its ordinary meaning. Id. at 225-26, 496 N.W.2d at 179
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8266 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
906. Here, the circuit court conducted a plea colloquy that satisfied the court’s mandatory duties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102346 - 2017-09-21
906. Here, the circuit court conducted a plea colloquy that satisfied the court’s mandatory duties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102346 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 87
have all the duties generally held by a supervising attorney under SCR 20:5.1(b). ¶15 IT IS FURTHER
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71180 - 2014-09-15
have all the duties generally held by a supervising attorney under SCR 20:5.1(b). ¶15 IT IS FURTHER
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71180 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gerald O. Green
and reflected poorly on Green’s character. A sentencing court always has an independent duty to look beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20769 - 2005-12-27
and reflected poorly on Green’s character. A sentencing court always has an independent duty to look beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20769 - 2005-12-27
[PDF]
WI 131
, Attorney Schuster comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30899 - 2014-09-15
, Attorney Schuster comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30899 - 2014-09-15