Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30721 - 30730 of 64077 for records/1000.
Search results 30721 - 30730 of 64077 for records/1000.
State v. Frank Jude Steffes
the record when he asserts that at the intersection of Vista Road and Highway B he “waited for these vehicles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6232 - 2005-03-31
the record when he asserts that at the intersection of Vista Road and Highway B he “waited for these vehicles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6232 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Bintz
by a logical rationale, based on facts of record and involve no errors of law. In re Shawn B.N., 173 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3350 - 2005-03-31
by a logical rationale, based on facts of record and involve no errors of law. In re Shawn B.N., 173 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3350 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 The parties do not explain in their briefs, and it is unclear from the record, how Bogan came
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123551 - 2017-09-21
3 The parties do not explain in their briefs, and it is unclear from the record, how Bogan came
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123551 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frank Jude Steffes
In his brief, he misrepresents the record when he asserts that at the intersection of Vista Road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6232 - 2017-09-19
In his brief, he misrepresents the record when he asserts that at the intersection of Vista Road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6232 - 2017-09-19
State v. James R. Walz
in the record to support such an inference. Walz did not testify, and the first indication in the trooper’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6715 - 2005-03-31
in the record to support such an inference. Walz did not testify, and the first indication in the trooper’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6715 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Perkins
-CR 5 newly discovered evidence. His report and affidavit are part of the record. We now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15210 - 2017-09-21
-CR 5 newly discovered evidence. His report and affidavit are part of the record. We now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15210 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that Madrid did not raise this argument below, the court therefore did not rule on it, and from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35613 - 2009-02-18
that Madrid did not raise this argument below, the court therefore did not rule on it, and from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35613 - 2009-02-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from the record and trial testimony and are provided as background. This court recognizes that Obasi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95074 - 2014-09-15
from the record and trial testimony and are provided as background. This court recognizes that Obasi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95074 - 2014-09-15
Adolph F. Cebula v. Thomas Cotter
, they assert, without citation to evidence in the record, that there is a genuine issue of material fact. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2635 - 2005-03-31
, they assert, without citation to evidence in the record, that there is a genuine issue of material fact. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2635 - 2005-03-31
Corey J. Hampton v. David H. Schwarz
petitioner’s probation…. Moreover, [Hampton’s] own testimony and his cell phone records provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3694 - 2005-03-31
petitioner’s probation…. Moreover, [Hampton’s] own testimony and his cell phone records provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3694 - 2005-03-31