Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3081 - 3090 of 6989 for a u.
Search results 3081 - 3090 of 6989 for a u.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be able to get me a plea barg[a]in in which [he] would be ‘g[u]aranteed’ 10-15 years in prison.” Booker
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174957 - 2017-09-21
be able to get me a plea barg[a]in in which [he] would be ‘g[u]aranteed’ 10-15 years in prison.” Booker
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174957 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Maureen Rainer v. Jerome C. Gathier
on the availability of [u]nderinsured motorist coverage.” Rainer contends that the Nelson holding is inapplicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2426 - 2017-09-19
on the availability of [u]nderinsured motorist coverage.” Rainer contends that the Nelson holding is inapplicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2426 - 2017-09-19
2007 WI APP 240
at the time. The court explained that “[u]nder the influence” meant Hubbard’s “ability to operate a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30631 - 2007-11-27
at the time. The court explained that “[u]nder the influence” meant Hubbard’s “ability to operate a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30631 - 2007-11-27
2010 WI APP 93
request. However, the State then asserts, without citation or explanation, that “[u]nder the rationale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51491 - 2011-01-27
request. However, the State then asserts, without citation or explanation, that “[u]nder the rationale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51491 - 2011-01-27
COURT OF APPEALS
… and at this point I see no reason to grant the motion for mistrial.” ¶11 “[U]nless a newspaper article is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31146 - 2007-12-11
… and at this point I see no reason to grant the motion for mistrial.” ¶11 “[U]nless a newspaper article is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31146 - 2007-12-11
[PDF]
James A. Olson v. Lori Olson
governs appeals in criminal matters. 3 The Supremacy Clause, Article VI, Clause 2 of the U. S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12946 - 2017-09-21
governs appeals in criminal matters. 3 The Supremacy Clause, Article VI, Clause 2 of the U. S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12946 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 240
the influence of a prescription medication at the time. The court explained that “[u]nder the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30631 - 2014-09-15
the influence of a prescription medication at the time. The court explained that “[u]nder the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30631 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
consumed the first drink; (U) What time she consumed the last drink; (V) Whether she took any street
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460339 - 2021-12-07
consumed the first drink; (U) What time she consumed the last drink; (V) Whether she took any street
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460339 - 2021-12-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Data Key, 356 Wis. 2d 665, ¶19). A complaint will be dismissed if, “‘[u]nder the guise of notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256752 - 2020-03-17
Data Key, 356 Wis. 2d 665, ¶19). A complaint will be dismissed if, “‘[u]nder the guise of notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256752 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
WI APP 14
for suppression as a remedy; thus, as DHHS explained during its promulgation: “[U]nder the HIPAA statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31235 - 2014-09-15
for suppression as a remedy; thus, as DHHS explained during its promulgation: “[U]nder the HIPAA statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31235 - 2014-09-15