Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30881 - 30890 of 81911 for simple case.
Search results 30881 - 30890 of 81911 for simple case.
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissal of Arrow Financial Services, LLC’s case against him. Lunemann claims he was entitled to attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36669 - 2009-06-01
dismissal of Arrow Financial Services, LLC’s case against him. Lunemann claims he was entitled to attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36669 - 2009-06-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
had an open case pending in which he was charged with disorderly conduct. The State moved to join
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746326 - 2024-01-03
had an open case pending in which he was charged with disorderly conduct. The State moved to join
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746326 - 2024-01-03
COURT OF APPEALS
trial dates of February 15, 2011 or August 23, 2011. Flehmer’s trial was delayed because other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87247 - 2012-09-17
trial dates of February 15, 2011 or August 23, 2011. Flehmer’s trial was delayed because other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87247 - 2012-09-17
State v. Clayton T. Veldt
This case involves three separate OWI offenses. Veldt’s first arrest occurred on September 13, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5357 - 2005-03-31
This case involves three separate OWI offenses. Veldt’s first arrest occurred on September 13, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5357 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of this case to the sentencing factors and reached a result that was both reasoned and reasonable. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98819 - 2013-06-27
of this case to the sentencing factors and reached a result that was both reasoned and reasonable. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98819 - 2013-06-27
State v. Juan B. Garcia
to the State’s failure to comply with a pretrial discovery order. We agree, and reverse and remand the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6313 - 2005-03-31
to the State’s failure to comply with a pretrial discovery order. We agree, and reverse and remand the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6313 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 2006). Holloway contends that Roehl lacked reasonable grounds to conduct a search in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57806 - 2014-09-15
. 2006). Holloway contends that Roehl lacked reasonable grounds to conduct a search in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57806 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Melvin A. Neuman v. Circuit Court for Marathon County
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0714 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15265 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0714 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15265 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Travis G. Lankford
erred when it barred him from introducing evidence that the Intoximeter used in this case had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7557 - 2017-09-19
erred when it barred him from introducing evidence that the Intoximeter used in this case had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7557 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles V. Royster
[not] make the amount of money involved in a particular case irrelevant or preclude the court from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24971 - 2017-09-21
[not] make the amount of money involved in a particular case irrelevant or preclude the court from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24971 - 2017-09-21