Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30971 - 30980 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 30971 - 30980 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
is not prohibited from adopting a party’s proposed document as its decision in a case, if the circuit court chooses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
is not prohibited from adopting a party’s proposed document as its decision in a case, if the circuit court chooses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 30, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122864 - 2014-09-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 30, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122864 - 2014-09-29
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 10, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87849 - 2012-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 10, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87849 - 2012-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
.” ¶6 In its oral decision, the circuit court concluded: I’m convinced by reviewing the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98184 - 2013-06-17
.” ¶6 In its oral decision, the circuit court concluded: I’m convinced by reviewing the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98184 - 2013-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS
2008 WI App 32 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP919-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31233 - 2008-02-19
2008 WI App 32 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP919-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31233 - 2008-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS
) (Leonard I). The supreme court denied review in both cases. In December of 2003, Andre filed a Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50732 - 2010-06-07
) (Leonard I). The supreme court denied review in both cases. In December of 2003, Andre filed a Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50732 - 2010-06-07
COURT OF APPEALS
The circuit court in this case denied Simpson’s motion, concluding it was procedurally barred because issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73446 - 2011-11-07
The circuit court in this case denied Simpson’s motion, concluding it was procedurally barred because issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73446 - 2011-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS
. Despite the default finding, the trial court allowed her to cross‑examine the case worker and testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36514 - 2009-05-18
. Despite the default finding, the trial court allowed her to cross‑examine the case worker and testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36514 - 2009-05-18
COURT OF APPEALS
In this case, the circuit court’s written decision is fully consistent with the rules noted above
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28818 - 2007-04-30
In this case, the circuit court’s written decision is fully consistent with the rules noted above
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28818 - 2007-04-30
COURT OF APPEALS
, but in this case the court did not require the disclosure of lay witnesses. Here, the circuit court appropriately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101638 - 2013-09-09
, but in this case the court did not require the disclosure of lay witnesses. Here, the circuit court appropriately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101638 - 2013-09-09