Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30991 - 31000 of 57358 for id.

[PDF] State v. Mark T. Smith
it is clearly erroneous. See id., 65 Wis. 2d at 596, 223 N.W.2d at 557. ¶10 We cannot say on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6931 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Frontsheet
for misdemeanor bail jumping. Id., ¶¶12, 25. ¶6 Several other counts of misconduct in Guenther III related
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126603 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Arthur Beiersdorf
crime resulting in revocation of the prior probation.1 Id. at 87, 423 N.W.2d at 534. It explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9013 - 2017-09-19

Brian Read v. Donald Read
application.” Id. at 115, 352 N.W.2d at 228 (citations omitted). Looking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9632 - 2005-03-31

WI App 94 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1785 Complete Title of...
] and is considered filed when received by the federal or local agency.” Id. (emphasis added). Background ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64289 - 2011-06-28

WI App 61 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2010AP594 2010AP1155 Comp...
of surrounding or closely-related statutes; and reasonably, to avoid absurd or unreasonable results.” Id., ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62705 - 2011-06-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
health or welfare and if the proposed work will improve land within the district.” Id. (citing WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97878 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the court correctly interpreted and applied § 973.13 is a question that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402480 - 2021-07-30

State v. Sonniel R. Gidarisingh
of this inquiry if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on one. See id. at 697. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14165 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not have a duty to inform defendants about the mandatory DNA surcharge.” See id., ¶12. Consequently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226748 - 2018-11-06