Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31041 - 31050 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 31041 - 31050 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
42, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. In Gallion, our supreme court held that “[i]n each case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144102 - 2015-07-06
42, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. In Gallion, our supreme court held that “[i]n each case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144102 - 2015-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
that the facts in this case are similar to the facts in Haanstad. In Haanstad, the supreme court reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76458 - 2012-01-11
that the facts in this case are similar to the facts in Haanstad. In Haanstad, the supreme court reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76458 - 2012-01-11
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 18, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105728 - 2013-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 18, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105728 - 2013-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75723 - 2011-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75723 - 2011-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS
parenthood apply under the circumstances in this case. The trial court rejected Robert’s constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36247 - 2009-04-20
parenthood apply under the circumstances in this case. The trial court rejected Robert’s constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36247 - 2009-04-20
COURT OF APPEALS
44 (1997) (appellate court should decide cases on the narrowest possible grounds). [3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83349 - 2012-06-04
44 (1997) (appellate court should decide cases on the narrowest possible grounds). [3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83349 - 2012-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
The circuit court turned to a discussion with Adams about the specific facts of the case, and Adams suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118163 - 2014-07-28
The circuit court turned to a discussion with Adams about the specific facts of the case, and Adams suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118163 - 2014-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
it to be untrue, with respect to courts generally, or the particular sentencing judge in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32392 - 2008-04-09
it to be untrue, with respect to courts generally, or the particular sentencing judge in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32392 - 2008-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 28, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101287 - 2013-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 28, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101287 - 2013-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 23, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35012 - 2008-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 23, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35012 - 2008-12-22