Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31051 - 31060 of 55951 for so.
Search results 31051 - 31060 of 55951 for so.
H. James Oberg v. Donald W. Helgesen
the Obergs' claim for rescission, but did not discuss any reason for doing so, apparently because the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9005 - 2005-03-31
the Obergs' claim for rescission, but did not discuss any reason for doing so, apparently because the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9005 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dan E. Holman
). Moreover, restrictions that impact on First Amendment freedoms must be narrowly proscribed so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4341 - 2005-03-31
). Moreover, restrictions that impact on First Amendment freedoms must be narrowly proscribed so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4341 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
penalty range. The sentence was also well within the maximum Padilla faced, and therefore was not so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138408 - 2015-03-22
penalty range. The sentence was also well within the maximum Padilla faced, and therefore was not so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138408 - 2015-03-22
State v. Terri L. Boortz
no reason to do so here. Review after a guilty plea is generally only granted if the issue is of state-wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12690 - 2005-03-31
no reason to do so here. Review after a guilty plea is generally only granted if the issue is of state-wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12690 - 2005-03-31
Racine County Human Services Department v. Olivia G.
, but it was in Milwaukee county and Olivia did not want to be that far from home. So, the court said that “until a place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6546 - 2005-03-31
, but it was in Milwaukee county and Olivia did not want to be that far from home. So, the court said that “until a place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6546 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig M. Molstad
, but refused to do so and instead requested a trial. That ends the matter because there is no evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10241 - 2005-03-31
, but refused to do so and instead requested a trial. That ends the matter because there is no evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10241 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the report and was advised of his right to file a response. He has not done so. Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113964 - 2014-06-10
of the report and was advised of his right to file a response. He has not done so. Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113964 - 2014-06-10
CA Blank Order
did so properly because up to that point no new question, since February 2013, had been raised about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131172 - 2014-11-30
did so properly because up to that point no new question, since February 2013, had been raised about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131172 - 2014-11-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence, we look at whether “‘the evidence, viewed most favorably to the state and the conviction, is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69503 - 2011-08-15
of the evidence, we look at whether “‘the evidence, viewed most favorably to the state and the conviction, is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69503 - 2011-08-15
Durand Cooperatives v. Dennis Emmert
in the event the crop failed to meet the criteria, but they failed to do so. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12417 - 2005-03-31
in the event the crop failed to meet the criteria, but they failed to do so. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12417 - 2005-03-31