Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31081 - 31090 of 63197 for records.
Search results 31081 - 31090 of 63197 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment should be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244231 - 2019-07-24
of the record, we conclude that the judgment should be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244231 - 2019-07-24
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of justice. After review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
of justice. After review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Saffold could raise on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214069 - 2018-06-07
of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Saffold could raise on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214069 - 2018-06-07
[PDF]
State v. James F. Emerich
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2359 - 2017-09-19
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2359 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207494 - 2018-01-23
right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207494 - 2018-01-23
State v. James R. Donohoo
performance of the forbidden conduct to others.”). We have reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8563 - 2005-03-31
performance of the forbidden conduct to others.”). We have reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8563 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124147 - 2014-10-21
review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124147 - 2014-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does not support his position. Batson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33531 - 2008-07-29
that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does not support his position. Batson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33531 - 2008-07-29
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Joshua J. Minich
of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. See Burkes v. Hales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21442 - 2006-02-15
of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. See Burkes v. Hales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21442 - 2006-02-15