Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31131 - 31140 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 31131 - 31140 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2019AP1484-CRNM 2 response, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=427019 - 2021-09-21
. No. 2019AP1484-CRNM 2 response, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=427019 - 2021-09-21
State v. Lawrence Earl Parks
in the record, the State did not know if Parks would accept its offer until the day before the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13690 - 2005-03-31
in the record, the State did not know if Parks would accept its offer until the day before the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13690 - 2005-03-31
Laura Roberson v. Donald Jessup
mental process based upon facts of record and the applicable law. Hartung v. Hartung, 102 Wis.2d 58, 66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9327 - 2005-03-31
mental process based upon facts of record and the applicable law. Hartung v. Hartung, 102 Wis.2d 58, 66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9327 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
considered as a statement of “any other person,” and not as “victims,” the record reflects that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72859 - 2011-10-26
considered as a statement of “any other person,” and not as “victims,” the record reflects that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72859 - 2011-10-26
Dane County v. William S.
that there was clear and convincing evidence in the record that William posed a substantial risk of danger to others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12411 - 2005-03-31
that there was clear and convincing evidence in the record that William posed a substantial risk of danger to others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12411 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231186 - 2018-12-19
review of the briefs and record, we 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231186 - 2018-12-19
[PDF]
Rodosbaldo Pozo v. Sheriff Karl Halverson
2 The plaintiff’s complaint requests the return of only $1,752.00, but the record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12268 - 2017-09-21
2 The plaintiff’s complaint requests the return of only $1,752.00, but the record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12268 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey J. Czerniak
to the record, in violation of Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d) and (3) of the rules of appellate procedure, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5876 - 2005-03-31
to the record, in violation of Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d) and (3) of the rules of appellate procedure, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059263 - 2026-01-13
for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059263 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959457 - 2025-05-22
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959457 - 2025-05-22