Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31131 - 31140 of 36435 for e's.
Search results 31131 - 31140 of 36435 for e's.
State v. Garrett Ely
the seriousness of the juvenile’s offense” and to “[e]xpand adult court jurisdiction to homicides or attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14129 - 2005-03-31
the seriousness of the juvenile’s offense” and to “[e]xpand adult court jurisdiction to homicides or attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14129 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: KAREN E. CHRISTENSON, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Brennan and Bradley, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147269 - 2015-08-31
: KAREN E. CHRISTENSON, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Brennan and Bradley, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147269 - 2015-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 16, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of ...
. (d) The wishes of the child. (e) The duration of the separation of the parent from the child. (f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121735 - 2014-09-15
. (d) The wishes of the child. (e) The duration of the separation of the parent from the child. (f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121735 - 2014-09-15
Edward N. Gerczak, Jr. v. Edward N. Gerczak, Sr.
) and (3). In addition, “[e]xcept as provided under subs. (7) (a), (7p) and (10), income earned or accrued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18548 - 2005-07-26
) and (3). In addition, “[e]xcept as provided under subs. (7) (a), (7p) and (10), income earned or accrued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18548 - 2005-07-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standard of review. State v. Conner, 2012 WI App 105, ¶15, 344 Wis. 2d 233, 821 N.W.2d 267. “[W]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001148 - 2025-08-26
standard of review. State v. Conner, 2012 WI App 105, ¶15, 344 Wis. 2d 233, 821 N.W.2d 267. “[W]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001148 - 2025-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case, seizing on our statement that “[w]e reject the closing argument issue.” Hicks, No. 2009AP3044-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2012-12-10
of the case, seizing on our statement that “[w]e reject the closing argument issue.” Hicks, No. 2009AP3044-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2012-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
the existing facts and circumstances.’” Id. (citation omitted). “‘[W]e will sustain the sanction of dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107307 - 2014-01-27
the existing facts and circumstances.’” Id. (citation omitted). “‘[W]e will sustain the sanction of dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107307 - 2014-01-27
Marvin Herman v. County of Walworth
., the cause was submitted on the brief of Mari E. Nahn, Deputy Corporation Counsel, Walworth County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18949 - 2005-08-30
., the cause was submitted on the brief of Mari E. Nahn, Deputy Corporation Counsel, Walworth County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18949 - 2005-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
Berlin police department with 23 years [of] experience,” and that “[h]e recognized the odor from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85492 - 2012-07-30
Berlin police department with 23 years [of] experience,” and that “[h]e recognized the odor from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85492 - 2012-07-30
State v. Juan Smith
Denying Smith’s request for a continuance, the trial court said little more than: [W]e were aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3209 - 2005-03-31
Denying Smith’s request for a continuance, the trial court said little more than: [W]e were aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3209 - 2005-03-31