Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31321 - 31330 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] State v. Bruce Blodgett
this issue. “From a previous offense” is too vague a statement to be said to invoke the idea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12416 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
motion. Nevertheless, it is clear from the circuit court’s statements at trial concerning his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622126 - 2023-02-15

[PDF] State v. Darin W. Baratka
that this misleading statement interfered with his ability to understand his rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5063 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Bradley G. Genrich
explained his earlier statement to police that Genrich looked “normal” when they parted company
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24519 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. § 908.01(3) (“‘Hearsay’ is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61618 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not include his statement to police. A challenge to Jacobs’ sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109491 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joseph D. Minkin
Minkin argues he was similarly prejudiced by the amendment. He notes our statement in Wilks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6445 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lue Her
an attorney could do for him.” The State cites that statement to support its argument that Her was aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7521 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
; and Cameron’s flight, concealment, and inconsistent statements together provide a more than adequate basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012249 - 2025-09-23

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
decision to exercise his right to testify, opening statements, and closing arguments— does not disclose
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971667 - 2025-06-18