Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31321 - 31330 of 57351 for id.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on irrelevant or improper factors. Id. The three primary factors to be considered are the gravity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112729 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Torrence C. Borum
considered the pertinent facts, applied the relevant law, and reached a reasonable decision. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4283 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the public. Id., ¶22; see also State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶23, 270 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594385 - 2022-11-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
be appropriate. Id. at 21-22. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102036 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
, and if the language is not ambiguous, we apply the plain meaning of the statute to the facts before us.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61920 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to allow victims to recover their losses as a result of a defendant’s criminal conduct.’” Id. (citation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643596 - 2023-04-12

[PDF] State v. Jerry M. Brandt
, a trial whose result is reliable. Id. at 687. This court need not address both components
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12853 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
importance, or there is a need to guide the trial courts, or it is likely to recur. Id. ¶6 Though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31877 - 2008-02-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and reasonable inferences drawn by the fact-finder. Id. Thus, in cases tried without a jury, “the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143654 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ronnell Wallace
the missing portion of the transcripts can be reconstructed. Id. at 103, 401 N.W.2d at 753. Only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8101 - 2017-09-19