Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31421 - 31430 of 74688 for public records.

City of Fort Atkinson v. Trish A. Jonas
factual basis in the record for the circuit court’s determination and the evidentiary decision was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3603 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
complaint was a public record, equally accessible to Rolack. In any case, Rolack also fails to show how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39043 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, it was based on findings supported by the record and was made according to a correct theory of law. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180957 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112478 - 2014-05-12

Hoppe Builders, Inc. v. Shaun L. Moersfelder
of record, stating the specific ground of objection, if the specific ground was not apparent from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8096 - 2005-03-31

City of Madison v. Robert R. Schultz
to do so here. Schultz’s argument presents an issue of law on the undisputed facts already of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15158 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, opened his shop’s restrooms to the public during community festivals. Whether Holifield was attending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18

[PDF] Strombeck Partnership v. Joseph P. Apollo
.2d 587, 345 N.W.2d 417 (1984). The record reveals, however, that the Apollos were represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8664 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
decision must be reversed because that decision was not based on substantial evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79223 - 2014-09-15

Lindsay Mosher v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
decision, we examine the record to determine if the circuit court logically interpreted the facts, applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15114 - 2005-03-31