Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31481 - 31490 of 81880 for simple case.
Search results 31481 - 31490 of 81880 for simple case.
COURT OF APPEALS
observed pursuant to duty imposed by law, or (c) in civil cases and against the State in criminal cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130674 - 2014-12-01
observed pursuant to duty imposed by law, or (c) in civil cases and against the State in criminal cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130674 - 2014-12-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 805.16(1). The verdict in this case was rendered in 1996, and the record contains no circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34836 - 2014-09-15
. § 805.16(1). The verdict in this case was rendered in 1996, and the record contains no circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34836 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
charges, if proven at a hearing, would entitle him to withdraw his plea. That would not be the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33804 - 2014-09-15
charges, if proven at a hearing, would entitle him to withdraw his plea. That would not be the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33804 - 2014-09-15
Elizabeth A. Ryder v. Society Insurance
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0048
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11925 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0048
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11925 - 2005-03-31
Nancy Koch v. P. A. Bergner & Company
that a malicious prosecution case based on a municipal forfeiture prosecution required proof of special damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9163 - 2005-03-31
that a malicious prosecution case based on a municipal forfeiture prosecution required proof of special damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9163 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
erroneously exercised its discretion in his case by imposing the surcharge without giving adequate reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46728 - 2014-09-15
erroneously exercised its discretion in his case by imposing the surcharge without giving adequate reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46728 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92837 - 2014-09-15
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92837 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23
erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on July 31, 2020, and ordered $250 cash bond on this case. Monge posted bond that same day
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819266 - 2024-07-03
on July 31, 2020, and ordered $250 cash bond on this case. Monge posted bond that same day
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819266 - 2024-07-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
pled no contest to killing Joel even though the State’s case was weakened by the medical examiner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29407 - 2014-09-15
pled no contest to killing Joel even though the State’s case was weakened by the medical examiner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29407 - 2014-09-15