Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3151 - 3160 of 78021 for restraining order/1000.
Search results 3151 - 3160 of 78021 for restraining order/1000.
[PDF]
Nanci Brisbane v. Peter J. Vallecillo
there. Vallecillo countered that the charges had been dropped and that he was subject only to a restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4417 - 2017-09-19
there. Vallecillo countered that the charges had been dropped and that he was subject only to a restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4417 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
” and “wrongfully threaten[ed] [Garner] with 2 restraining orders and 1 criminal [u]nlawful [p]hone [c]onduct legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36763 - 2009-06-15
” and “wrongfully threaten[ed] [Garner] with 2 restraining orders and 1 criminal [u]nlawful [p]hone [c]onduct legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36763 - 2009-06-15
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Phillip Ries
“filed for [a] domestic violence restraining order.” The trial court was apprised of additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9620 - 2017-09-19
“filed for [a] domestic violence restraining order.” The trial court was apprised of additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9620 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Blechinger and Christine Seidl, Respondents-Respondents. APPEAL from orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135153 - 2015-02-17
Blechinger and Christine Seidl, Respondents-Respondents. APPEAL from orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135153 - 2015-02-17
Nanci Brisbane v. Peter J. Vallecillo
that the charges had been dropped and that he was subject only to a restraining order targeted at preventing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4417 - 2005-03-31
that the charges had been dropped and that he was subject only to a restraining order targeted at preventing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4417 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2020AP811 3 appeal.3 Sveum was convicted in December 1994 for violating a restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345165 - 2021-03-11
. No. 2020AP811 3 appeal.3 Sveum was convicted in December 1994 for violating a restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345165 - 2021-03-11
[PDF]
Published Order
2023 WI 70 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN NOTICE This order is subject to further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714128 - 2024-01-08
2023 WI 70 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN NOTICE This order is subject to further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714128 - 2024-01-08
COURT OF APPEALS
yelled an order for Mr. Lombrano to stop,” but, at that time, “nothing was known by the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121738 - 2014-09-15
yelled an order for Mr. Lombrano to stop,” but, at that time, “nothing was known by the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121738 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 16
a drug debt. Based on the conviction, Smith was ordered to register as a sex offender. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34903 - 2009-01-27
a drug debt. Based on the conviction, Smith was ordered to register as a sex offender. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34903 - 2009-01-27
Kevin D. Nelson v. Karl Heichler
. In order to determine whether a party is entitled to a new trial on the grounds that jurors were prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7973 - 2005-03-31
. In order to determine whether a party is entitled to a new trial on the grounds that jurors were prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7973 - 2005-03-31