Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31591 - 31600 of 62360 for child support.

State v. Daniel Joseph Chaulklin
hold. Moreover, even Swanson's dictum does not support Chaulklin's position here, where the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8858 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael James Last
should have been given in support of the theory of defense. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 Last
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4895 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. William Hardy Thornton, Jr.
in an execution of a search warrant. Thornton's original trial counsel did not present any evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10283 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
was supported by reasonable suspicion that Bucholtz was engaged in criminal activity and by reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29106 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Keith A. Brown v. Classic Inns of Wisconsin, Inc.
to support its decision, and because the prejudicial nature of the evidence outweighed its probative value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3939 - 2017-09-20

Robert E. Taliaferro, Jr. v. Judy Smith
to the adjustment committee for further consideration, noting there was insufficient evidence to support the sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18891 - 2005-07-06

Kay & Andersen v. Ameritech Publishing, Inc.
an enforceable contract limitation on liability and whether the evidence supports the damage award. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7482 - 2005-03-31

State v. Emmanuel Page
lesser-included jury instructions; (2) whether the evidence was sufficient to support Page's convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10477 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and the evidence did not support the court’s finding that Leach beat the victim. Leach’s arguments lack merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173393 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mark Armbruster v. David M. Counard
that there is no evidence to support the judgment. We affirm. No. 96-1315 -2- I. This case arises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10798 - 2017-09-20