Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31591 - 31600 of 63539 for records.
Search results 31591 - 31600 of 63539 for records.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Nos. 2006AP1515 2006AP1516 3 ¶3 In 2001, Jones made open records requests with the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28502 - 2014-09-15
. Nos. 2006AP1515 2006AP1516 3 ¶3 In 2001, Jones made open records requests with the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28502 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of our record. As his entire appeal relies on this order, we could deny it on this basis alone. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036780 - 2025-11-12
of our record. As his entire appeal relies on this order, we could deny it on this basis alone. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036780 - 2025-11-12
State v. Leslie M. Haynes
otherwise noted. [2] Haynes has not provided in her appellate briefs citations to the record to corroborate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3262 - 2005-03-31
otherwise noted. [2] Haynes has not provided in her appellate briefs citations to the record to corroborate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rudy A. Gerardo
on the day scheduled for jury trial in this case. The record indicates that after the jury selection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13508 - 2017-09-21
on the day scheduled for jury trial in this case. The record indicates that after the jury selection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13508 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mitchell Miller
that a trial court articulate the basis for the sentence imposed on the facts of the record: “‘[T]here should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20327 - 2007-06-04
that a trial court articulate the basis for the sentence imposed on the facts of the record: “‘[T]here should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20327 - 2007-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the record required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We concluded that there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41323 - 2009-09-28
review of the record required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We concluded that there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41323 - 2009-09-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at a sheriff’s execution sale. The sheriff certified and recorded the sale consistent with WIS. STAT. § 815.38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258243 - 2020-04-21
at a sheriff’s execution sale. The sheriff certified and recorded the sale consistent with WIS. STAT. § 815.38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258243 - 2020-04-21
[PDF]
Ozaukee County Department of Social Services v. John D.
). With respect to the burden of persuasion, our careful review of the record indicates that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5206 - 2017-09-19
). With respect to the burden of persuasion, our careful review of the record indicates that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5206 - 2017-09-19
State v. Margaret C.
to the record, Rule 809.19(1)(e) & (3)(a), Stats. This court will not develop Margaret’s argument for her. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14792 - 2005-03-31
to the record, Rule 809.19(1)(e) & (3)(a), Stats. This court will not develop Margaret’s argument for her. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14792 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
not respond. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112086 - 2014-05-06
not respond. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112086 - 2014-05-06