Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31641 - 31650 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 31641 - 31650 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Holmes
, he points to the following statement in Bangert: The trial judge in this case did not ascertain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15451 - 2017-09-21
, he points to the following statement in Bangert: The trial judge in this case did not ascertain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15451 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
responsibility for the sexual assaults. The court also highlighted its previous statement that “women
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213877 - 2018-06-06
responsibility for the sexual assaults. The court also highlighted its previous statement that “women
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213877 - 2018-06-06
[PDF]
Milwaukee County v. Edward S.
was a correct statement of the law, no ground for reversal exists. See id. In this case, therefore, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13987 - 2014-09-15
was a correct statement of the law, no ground for reversal exists. See id. In this case, therefore, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13987 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kenneth W. Rupena v. Palmer Johnson of Racine, Inc.
interpretation of Rupena’s testimony such that he could be impeached with that statement at trial, he could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4607 - 2017-09-19
interpretation of Rupena’s testimony such that he could be impeached with that statement at trial, he could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4607 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Kerry D. Severson v. Donald Gudmanson
in its decision: “Inmate[’s] statement does not directly dispute the above listed allegations. Inmate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13039 - 2017-09-21
in its decision: “Inmate[’s] statement does not directly dispute the above listed allegations. Inmate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13039 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
physically incapacitating him, or (2) actually giving testimony by pressuring him to recant his statements so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30328 - 2007-09-17
physically incapacitating him, or (2) actually giving testimony by pressuring him to recant his statements so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30328 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
State v. Gary E. Andrashko
was Andrashko's statement that he raised the issues of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8579 - 2017-09-19
was Andrashko's statement that he raised the issues of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8579 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Raphael Perry
N.W.2d 493, 503 (1982), and can choose among conflicting statements of a witness, see State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15101 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 493, 503 (1982), and can choose among conflicting statements of a witness, see State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15101 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the “validity” of C.A.’s statements to investigators, and for failing to introduce evidence of a sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150573 - 2017-09-21
the “validity” of C.A.’s statements to investigators, and for failing to introduce evidence of a sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150573 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are clearly erroneous. While she submits an appendix identifying, for example, the neighbor’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929751 - 2025-03-19
are clearly erroneous. While she submits an appendix identifying, for example, the neighbor’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929751 - 2025-03-19