Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31661 - 31670 of 69131 for he.
Search results 31661 - 31670 of 69131 for he.
[PDF]
NOTICE
days due to time he spent in segregation. The circuit court concluded that it did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32530 - 2014-09-15
days due to time he spent in segregation. The circuit court concluded that it did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32530 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan v. Korry L. Ardell
Circuit Court entered into by his attorney of record. Ardell argues that because he did not sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19589 - 2017-09-21
Circuit Court entered into by his attorney of record. Ardell argues that because he did not sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19589 - 2017-09-21
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. William D. Ridgely
not receive a response from Ridgely, and he therefore sought relief by mandamus. On April 30, 1998, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14241 - 2005-03-31
not receive a response from Ridgely, and he therefore sought relief by mandamus. On April 30, 1998, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14241 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ruven Seibert
under WIS. STAT. § 980.08. 1 He argues that the trial court improperly allowed expert testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4380 - 2017-09-19
under WIS. STAT. § 980.08. 1 He argues that the trial court improperly allowed expert testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4380 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803107 - 2024-05-22
, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803107 - 2024-05-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 738, 744 (1967). Marks was informed of his right to file a response, but he has not responded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103463 - 2017-09-21
. 738, 744 (1967). Marks was informed of his right to file a response, but he has not responded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103463 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
motion, he argued that postconviction counsel had been ineffective “for failing to file a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32208 - 2005-03-31
motion, he argued that postconviction counsel had been ineffective “for failing to file a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32208 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and burglary while armed with a dangerous weapon, both as a repeat offender. He also appeals from an order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142690 - 2015-06-02
and burglary while armed with a dangerous weapon, both as a repeat offender. He also appeals from an order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142690 - 2015-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, but he has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294343 - 2020-10-07
right to file a response, but he has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294343 - 2020-10-07
Daniel D. Drow v. David H. Schwarz
treatment as a condition of probation. He participated in several different series of treatments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12686 - 2005-03-31
treatment as a condition of probation. He participated in several different series of treatments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12686 - 2005-03-31