Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3171 - 3180 of 63679 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3171 - 3180 of 63679 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Colleen M. Thomas
into an unlawful custodial arrest. The trial court denied the motion. Thomas later pled guilty to the OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15727 - 2017-09-21
into an unlawful custodial arrest. The trial court denied the motion. Thomas later pled guilty to the OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15727 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
in denying his motion for a mistrial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96867 - 2013-05-13
in denying his motion for a mistrial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96867 - 2013-05-13
State v. Kevin L. McCullough
hearing, the circuit court denied the motion, concluding that McCullough was not in custody when he gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19807 - 2005-10-03
hearing, the circuit court denied the motion, concluding that McCullough was not in custody when he gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19807 - 2005-10-03
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. McCullough
court denied the motion, concluding that McCullough was not in custody when he gave his initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19807 - 2017-09-21
court denied the motion, concluding that McCullough was not in custody when he gave his initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19807 - 2017-09-21
Peter A. Liptak v. Theresa A. Liptak
of the property by virtue of its conversion into a joint tenancy. ¶14 Wisconsin Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
of the property by virtue of its conversion into a joint tenancy. ¶14 Wisconsin Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion seeking plea withdrawal on the ground that his trial counsel was ineffective in various ways. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127185 - 2017-09-21
motion seeking plea withdrawal on the ground that his trial counsel was ineffective in various ways. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127185 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Murle E. Perkins
, his “joint custody and visitation rights.” From this, jurors could well conclude that Perkins had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15777 - 2017-09-21
, his “joint custody and visitation rights.” From this, jurors could well conclude that Perkins had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15777 - 2017-09-21
State v. Murle E. Perkins
“they enforce the monetary part and not anything else,” specifically, his “joint custody and visitation rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15777 - 2005-03-31
“they enforce the monetary part and not anything else,” specifically, his “joint custody and visitation rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15777 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Daniel R. Zawistowski v. Tammra S. Zawistowski
stipulated to joint legal custody and to a placement schedule that took into account each party’s work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3696 - 2017-09-19
stipulated to joint legal custody and to a placement schedule that took into account each party’s work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3696 - 2017-09-19
Daniel R. Zawistowski v. Tammra S. Zawistowski
of the divorce. Daniel and Tammra each earned approximately $40,000 annually. The parties stipulated to joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3696 - 2005-03-31
of the divorce. Daniel and Tammra each earned approximately $40,000 annually. The parties stipulated to joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3696 - 2005-03-31