Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31721 - 31730 of 57370 for id.

Laverne McCoy v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioner for the City of Milwaukee
of the trial court's ruling, we use a two-fold inquiry. Id. at 827, 472 N.W.2d at 582. First, we determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9549 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brandy Albert Essex
.” Id., 2004 WI 42, ¶46, 270 Wis. 2d at 560, 678 N.W.2d at 208.[1] Essex argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Carl H. Zahn
. Id. In reviewing a trial court's denial of a suppression motion, we will not disturb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9093 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews independently. Id. A defendant who moves for resentencing on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183294 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
be appropriate in some circumstances. See id., 205 Wis. 2d at 681, n.7, 556 N.W.2d at 139 n.7; see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128640 - 2014-11-17

State v. Gary L. Everts
sentence. See id. ¶9 Whether a fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor presents a legal issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18233 - 2005-05-24

State v. Michael J.K.
in the circuit court, the State might have responded by way of amendment or of additional proof. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15909 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the inference that supports the verdict.” Id. ¶3 A defendant is guilty of second-degree recklessly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141238 - 2015-05-04

Donna Sue Spielman v. Jeffrey Allen Spielman
of circumstances under § 767.32. Id. at 774-75. We also concluded that “a state family court may modify a payor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3030 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence and criminal activity.” Id. (citations omitted). If a stop and frisk is lawful, then seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61310 - 2011-03-16