Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 6991 for a u.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 6991 for a u.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
argument: [U]sually when I come before a jury to do my closing argument or my summing up, what I tell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28385 - 2007-03-12
argument: [U]sually when I come before a jury to do my closing argument or my summing up, what I tell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28385 - 2007-03-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (1967). Green filed a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156432 - 2017-09-21
and Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (1967). Green filed a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156432 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
their vehicle, made a U-turn before following and eventually stopping their vehicle. Both further testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101287 - 2013-08-27
their vehicle, made a U-turn before following and eventually stopping their vehicle. Both further testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101287 - 2013-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WISCONSIN STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) generally prohibits any person from driving while “[u]nder the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247408 - 2019-12-12
WISCONSIN STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) generally prohibits any person from driving while “[u]nder the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247408 - 2019-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “intoxicant” is not limited to alcohol. See WIS. STAT. § 939.22(42) (defining “[u]nder the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239895 - 2019-04-30
, “intoxicant” is not limited to alcohol. See WIS. STAT. § 939.22(42) (defining “[u]nder the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239895 - 2019-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. At the start of that hearing, the trial court stated that trial counsel for D.S. had “r[u]n into a licensing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282172 - 2020-08-25
. At the start of that hearing, the trial court stated that trial counsel for D.S. had “r[u]n into a licensing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282172 - 2020-08-25
2010 WI APP 93
request. However, the State then asserts, without citation or explanation, that “[u]nder the rationale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51491 - 2011-01-27
request. However, the State then asserts, without citation or explanation, that “[u]nder the rationale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51491 - 2011-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENT, V. AMIN U. SHAIKH AND NAHEED SHAIKH, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209045 - 2018-03-01
-RESPONDENT, V. AMIN U. SHAIKH AND NAHEED SHAIKH, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209045 - 2018-03-01
[PDF]
Ronald C. Kleutgen v. Robert A. McFadyen, Jr.
, they contend that the facts do not demonstrate as a matter of law that the Kleutgens “[u]sually cultivated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20079 - 2017-09-21
, they contend that the facts do not demonstrate as a matter of law that the Kleutgens “[u]sually cultivated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20079 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Timothy J. Winters v. Linda Winters
, and “[u]ndistributed income of a corporation, including a closely–held corporation, or any partnership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17623 - 2017-09-21
, and “[u]ndistributed income of a corporation, including a closely–held corporation, or any partnership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17623 - 2017-09-21