Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31831 - 31840 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 31831 - 31840 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1, 4-7, 27-28 (1968), was a case where the Court determined the officer lawfully stopped Terry after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70617 - 2011-09-06
. 1, 4-7, 27-28 (1968), was a case where the Court determined the officer lawfully stopped Terry after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70617 - 2011-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
is distinguishable because in that case, the court held that there was no reasonable, articulable suspicion to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29106 - 2007-05-22
is distinguishable because in that case, the court held that there was no reasonable, articulable suspicion to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29106 - 2007-05-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 1, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70432 - 2011-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 1, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70432 - 2011-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the current case. As part of the 2005 sentence, the court ordered that Anderson would be eligible for the ERP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47459 - 2010-03-01
of the current case. As part of the 2005 sentence, the court ordered that Anderson would be eligible for the ERP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47459 - 2010-03-01
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 19, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81294 - 2012-04-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 19, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81294 - 2012-04-18
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress the PBT results, and the trial court denied his motion. The case was tried to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146059 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the PBT results, and the trial court denied his motion. The case was tried to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146059 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). The State’s case outweighed Kosterman’s very weak one. The error was harmless. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23
). The State’s case outweighed Kosterman’s very weak one. The error was harmless. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 6, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67344 - 2011-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 6, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67344 - 2011-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 11, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56672 - 2010-11-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 11, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56672 - 2010-11-10
COURT OF APPEALS
the worst offenders. Id. at 569-70. This court has already rejected the application of death penalty cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30295 - 2007-09-18
the worst offenders. Id. at 569-70. This court has already rejected the application of death penalty cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30295 - 2007-09-18