Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31851 - 31860 of 58997 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 31851 - 31860 of 58997 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
requested further input from counsel as to whether there would be arguable merit to a claim for plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576898 - 2022-10-11
requested further input from counsel as to whether there would be arguable merit to a claim for plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576898 - 2022-10-11
State v. Laurie J. Malone
to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a).[1] The State claims the circuit court erred by staying the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16171 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a).[1] The State claims the circuit court erred by staying the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16171 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph L. O'Day
following his arrest. In his motion, he claimed that the test result violated his constitutional due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14930 - 2005-03-31
following his arrest. In his motion, he claimed that the test result violated his constitutional due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14930 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853935 - 2024-09-25
addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853935 - 2024-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Hakes. Because of the default judgments, only O’Brien’s claim against The X Bar remained for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89677 - 2014-09-15
and Hakes. Because of the default judgments, only O’Brien’s claim against The X Bar remained for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89677 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
as a claim that Pederson’s ineligibility for ERP and CIP constituted a new factor. ¶6 Pederson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87973 - 2012-10-09
as a claim that Pederson’s ineligibility for ERP and CIP constituted a new factor. ¶6 Pederson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87973 - 2012-10-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion by denying Campbell’s claims for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860611 - 2024-10-10
conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion by denying Campbell’s claims for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860611 - 2024-10-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the issue. ¶7 Gray also was not entitled to a hearing on his claim that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32221 - 2014-09-15
on the issue. ¶7 Gray also was not entitled to a hearing on his claim that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32221 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). Any claim that trial counsel was ineffective by failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189004 - 2017-09-21
.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). Any claim that trial counsel was ineffective by failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189004 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph L. O'Day
a motion to suppress the chemical test result obtained following his arrest. In his motion, he claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14930 - 2017-09-21
a motion to suppress the chemical test result obtained following his arrest. In his motion, he claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14930 - 2017-09-21