Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31851 - 31860 of 58547 for speedy trial.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the State introduced insufficient evidence at his jury trial to convict him of these offenses. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940351 - 2025-04-16

COURT OF APPEALS
’ residences. He appeals, arguing the evidence at his trial was insufficient as it did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143711 - 2015-06-30

State v. Gregory J. Crapp
. Gregory J. Crapp appeals from a judgment of conviction resulting from a jury trial in which he was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9772 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
generally argued her trial counsel was ineffective, the charges lacked a factual basis, and her plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060062 - 2026-01-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and that his trial counsel ineffectively failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102002 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Town of Windsor v. Village of DeForest
the remaining 234 acres as well, and DeForest did so. The issues are whether the trial court misapplied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3402 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the State introduced insufficient evidence at his jury trial to convict him of these offenses. Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940351 - 2025-04-16

Karen T. Runge v. Allstate Insurance Company
of § 631.43(1), Stats. The trial court ruled that it was not. We affirm. The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10126 - 2005-03-31

Milwaukee County v. Jacqualine S. W.
by the trial court ordering commitment for six months, pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 51.42 or 51.437 (1999-2000),[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4946 - 2005-03-31

State v. Serena M.T.
it admitted a videotape into evidence at Serena’s jury trial because the videotape was unfairly prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13815 - 2005-03-31