Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31871 - 31880 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 31871 - 31880 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
intoxicated, third offense. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103040 - 2017-09-21
intoxicated, third offense. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103040 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kevin N. Dornbrook
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue on appeal is whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15176 - 2005-03-31
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue on appeal is whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15176 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
hearing at which the State’s expert witness testified, the trial court denied Sweeney’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28031 - 2014-09-15
hearing at which the State’s expert witness testified, the trial court denied Sweeney’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28031 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael Bartz
and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial on the grounds that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9572 - 2017-09-19
and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial on the grounds that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9572 - 2017-09-19
State v. Timothy J. Helm
an order denying his motion for postconviction sentence modification pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4361 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for postconviction sentence modification pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4361 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that, assuming Wieczorek did not prevail on the seizure issue, there were other motions counsel still needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
that, assuming Wieczorek did not prevail on the seizure issue, there were other motions counsel still needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was criminally charged in connection with this find. Quezaire brought a suppression motion asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804505 - 2024-05-22
was criminally charged in connection with this find. Quezaire brought a suppression motion asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804505 - 2024-05-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
the judgment of conviction and the circuit court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence. The sole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28697 - 2014-09-15
the judgment of conviction and the circuit court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence. The sole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28697 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not be established. On September 7, the court granted the motion, ordered that “this matter is dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212213 - 2018-05-02
not be established. On September 7, the court granted the motion, ordered that “this matter is dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212213 - 2018-05-02
[PDF]
Brenda Moore v. M.J. Kortsch
costs of $100 against her for bringing a motion to reopen the dismissal order in the second action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3063 - 2017-09-19
costs of $100 against her for bringing a motion to reopen the dismissal order in the second action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3063 - 2017-09-19