Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31881 - 31890 of 59756 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 31881 - 31890 of 59756 for quit claim deed/1000.
Town of LaGrange v. Walworth County Board of Adjustment
and Jaswinder Sidhu, Cross-Claim Defendants- Appellants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7132 - 2005-03-31
and Jaswinder Sidhu, Cross-Claim Defendants- Appellants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7132 - 2005-03-31
The Falk Corporation v. Basil E. Ryan, Jr.
in February following entry of the amended judgment. Claiming an emergency existed, Falk obtained a show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10837 - 2005-03-31
in February following entry of the amended judgment. Claiming an emergency existed, Falk obtained a show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10837 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald W. Vodak v. Martin Kinyon
them, concluding the complaint did not state a claim for relief against them. The Vodaks do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11749 - 2017-09-20
them, concluding the complaint did not state a claim for relief against them. The Vodaks do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11749 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was entitled to relief based on the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. To establish a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89147 - 2014-09-15
was entitled to relief based on the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. To establish a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89147 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Derrick L. Madlock
the State’s claim of waiver. The State argues that Madlock waived his right to raise the issue on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21
the State’s claim of waiver. The State argues that Madlock waived his right to raise the issue on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of their claim. ¶7 In 2002, Katz asked for a tax reassessment on the building because, as he put it, “[v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68884 - 2011-08-23
of their claim. ¶7 In 2002, Katz asked for a tax reassessment on the building because, as he put it, “[v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68884 - 2011-08-23
Kickers of Wisconsin, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
.) Kickers brought a motion for partial summary judgment claiming to be the beneficial owner of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8018 - 2005-03-31
.) Kickers brought a motion for partial summary judgment claiming to be the beneficial owner of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8018 - 2005-03-31
State v. Luegene Antoine Hampton
-degree intentional homicide and attempted first-degree intentional homicide.[4] He claims that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4608 - 2005-03-31
-degree intentional homicide and attempted first-degree intentional homicide.[4] He claims that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4608 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 23
in favor of the State of Wisconsin, her employer, with regard to her wage claim. Magnussen asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504240 - 2022-06-08
in favor of the State of Wisconsin, her employer, with regard to her wage claim. Magnussen asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504240 - 2022-06-08
Frontsheet
Ritter made promises to pay, but failed to do so. Kernosky eventually filed a small claims action
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91259 - 2013-01-03
Ritter made promises to pay, but failed to do so. Kernosky eventually filed a small claims action
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91259 - 2013-01-03