Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31901 - 31910 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 31901 - 31910 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Cory C. Reed-Daniels
this is a completely supportable, provable case. The State was generous with Mr. Reed- Daniels. I could have issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24692 - 2017-09-21
this is a completely supportable, provable case. The State was generous with Mr. Reed- Daniels. I could have issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24692 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. On February 16, 2016, Vanhammond was charged in a second case with three counts of burglary, one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219324 - 2018-09-17
. On February 16, 2016, Vanhammond was charged in a second case with three counts of burglary, one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219324 - 2018-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to it. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191477 - 2017-09-21
to it. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191477 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162286 - 2017-09-21
2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162286 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James D. Miller
for the reasons Miller argues, it was admissible in this case to set the context for Miller’s response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3137 - 2017-09-19
for the reasons Miller argues, it was admissible in this case to set the context for Miller’s response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3137 - 2017-09-19
State v. Hiram Johnson
conviction on both counts is barred by statute. We remand the case for further proceedings. Johnson’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11498 - 2005-03-31
conviction on both counts is barred by statute. We remand the case for further proceedings. Johnson’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11498 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert P. Eggimann
at issue in this case is a “technical” defect. Id. at ¶14. A technical defect does not thwart personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2381 - 2005-03-31
at issue in this case is a “technical” defect. Id. at ¶14. A technical defect does not thwart personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2381 - 2005-03-31
Jimmie A. Woodford v. Dorothy Bolter
”; • that Woodford’s lawyer “dragged case more trouble”; • that Woodford’s lawyer told him not to move in order to turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5442 - 2013-05-12
”; • that Woodford’s lawyer “dragged case more trouble”; • that Woodford’s lawyer told him not to move in order to turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5442 - 2013-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to dismiss this case. Defoe sought dismissal on the ground that certain of the charges were multiplicitous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950146 - 2025-04-30
to dismiss this case. Defoe sought dismissal on the ground that certain of the charges were multiplicitous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950146 - 2025-04-30
COURT OF APPEALS
asserts that under the facts and circumstances of this case, the restitution amount ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33508 - 2008-07-23
asserts that under the facts and circumstances of this case, the restitution amount ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33508 - 2008-07-23