Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31931 - 31940 of 43184 for t o.
Search results 31931 - 31940 of 43184 for t o.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 19, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260757 - 2020-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 19, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260757 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
Tony G. Merriweather v. Gerald Berge
with the provisions of § DOC 303.70(12). Section DOC 303.70(12) states that “[t]he warden may review an inmate’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5829 - 2017-09-19
with the provisions of § DOC 303.70(12). Section DOC 303.70(12) states that “[t]he warden may review an inmate’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5829 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William C. Hartwig
substance, tetrahydrocannabinols (THC), contrary to §§ 161.41(3r) and 161.14(4)(t), STATS., and disorderly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8532 - 2017-09-19
substance, tetrahydrocannabinols (THC), contrary to §§ 161.41(3r) and 161.14(4)(t), STATS., and disorderly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8532 - 2017-09-19
Jalaina M.F. v. Blake W.A.
of time was “contradicted by the testimony” of herself and another witness; (2) “[t]here is also a dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13350 - 2005-03-31
of time was “contradicted by the testimony” of herself and another witness; (2) “[t]here is also a dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13350 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven W. Biever
to the blood test, and concluded that “[t]he police therefore had a duty to perform an additional test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15983 - 2017-09-21
to the blood test, and concluded that “[t]he police therefore had a duty to perform an additional test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15983 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ryan C. Rumlow
, “[t]he officer was faced with exactly the sort of situation in which a PBT proves extremely useful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3397 - 2005-03-31
, “[t]he officer was faced with exactly the sort of situation in which a PBT proves extremely useful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3397 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Irvin Ryan
whose mental disorder makes them dangerous, see id., 197 Wis. 2d at 271, 541 N.W.2d at 112 (“[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18127 - 2017-09-21
whose mental disorder makes them dangerous, see id., 197 Wis. 2d at 271, 541 N.W.2d at 112 (“[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18127 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Sandra L. Wojtasiak v. Podiatry Associates
to the MRI results. Reinherz testified that “[t]here has been no demonstration in the records that I have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4301 - 2017-09-19
to the MRI results. Reinherz testified that “[t]here has been no demonstration in the records that I have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4301 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, “[t]he determination of whether that new factor justifies sentence modification is committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
, “[t]he determination of whether that new factor justifies sentence modification is committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
Karen M. Polakowski v. John R. Polakowski
to enforce the stipulation based solely on Karen’s withdrawal of consent was erroneous. However, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5494 - 2005-03-31
to enforce the stipulation based solely on Karen’s withdrawal of consent was erroneous. However, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5494 - 2005-03-31