Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31971 - 31980 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 31971 - 31980 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Robert P. Behm
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), STATS.1 Behm contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13697 - 2014-09-15
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), STATS.1 Behm contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13697 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to trial.” We will address Spallas’ various issues below. We begin with the Alford pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192425 - 2017-09-21
to trial.” We will address Spallas’ various issues below. We begin with the Alford pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192425 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously denied Pierson’s motion to suppress statements made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34361 - 2014-09-15
on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously denied Pierson’s motion to suppress statements made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34361 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ronald C. Foust
)(a), Stats., as a third offense. He claims the trial court erred by relying on a constitutionally infirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
)(a), Stats., as a third offense. He claims the trial court erred by relying on a constitutionally infirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dennis G. Valstad
that Valstad’s probable cause challenge in the trial court was a generic claim that all of the evidence known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6260 - 2017-09-19
that Valstad’s probable cause challenge in the trial court was a generic claim that all of the evidence known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6260 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable suspicion. ¶8 The trial court acknowledged, “I have my internal doubts that [Ovaska’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54421 - 2010-09-13
reasonable suspicion. ¶8 The trial court acknowledged, “I have my internal doubts that [Ovaska’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54421 - 2010-09-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the statements. The court denied that motion as well as Kosterman’s renewed motion on the first day of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23
the statements. The court denied that motion as well as Kosterman’s renewed motion on the first day of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23
State v. Robert P. Behm
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), Stats.[1] Behm contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13697 - 2005-03-31
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), Stats.[1] Behm contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13697 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
claims the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Whitefish Bay/Jaster because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29760 - 2014-09-15
claims the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Whitefish Bay/Jaster because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29760 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ricardo Miramontes-Santos
CURLEY, J.[1] The State of Wisconsin appeals from the trial court’s orders suppressing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5108 - 2005-03-31
CURLEY, J.[1] The State of Wisconsin appeals from the trial court’s orders suppressing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5108 - 2005-03-31