Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31971 - 31980 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 31971 - 31980 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and resulted from the trial court’s improper focus on stale and “confused” facts and that the ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181792 - 2017-09-21
and resulted from the trial court’s improper focus on stale and “confused” facts and that the ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181792 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Timara Young v. Dusan Matic
. We will sustain the sanction of dismissal if there is a reasonable basis for the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12025 - 2017-09-21
. We will sustain the sanction of dismissal if there is a reasonable basis for the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12025 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the statements. The court denied that motion as well as Kosterman’s renewed motion on the first day of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95725 - 2014-09-15
the statements. The court denied that motion as well as Kosterman’s renewed motion on the first day of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95725 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Herder Hallmark Consultants, Inc. v. Regnier Consulting Group, Inc.
in this matter. Regnier and Regnier, Inc. assert that the trial court erred by concluding that an implied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6689 - 2017-09-20
in this matter. Regnier and Regnier, Inc. assert that the trial court erred by concluding that an implied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6689 - 2017-09-20
State v. John Tereschko
of this case.[2] The trial court held that it did. This court, however, deems it appropriate to affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3351 - 2005-03-31
of this case.[2] The trial court held that it did. This court, however, deems it appropriate to affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3351 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert P. Behm
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), STATS.1 Behm contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13697 - 2014-09-15
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), STATS.1 Behm contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13697 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment and costs were paid.[2] Koier claims that the trial court erred in denying her motion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35633 - 2009-02-23
judgment and costs were paid.[2] Koier claims that the trial court erred in denying her motion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35633 - 2009-02-23
[PDF]
Uni-General Corporation v. Century 21 Great American Homes, Inc.
that the trial court erroneously applied the doctrines of issue preclusion and laches to bar its action on its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14049 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erroneously applied the doctrines of issue preclusion and laches to bar its action on its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14049 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
violated the law—hardly an innocent act. Oetzman also claims that, at a trial to determine whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50773 - 2010-06-08
violated the law—hardly an innocent act. Oetzman also claims that, at a trial to determine whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50773 - 2010-06-08
[PDF]
State v. Jerry B. Rooni
the facts are, and we do not overturn a trial court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5548 - 2017-09-19
the facts are, and we do not overturn a trial court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5548 - 2017-09-19