Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31981 - 31990 of 37057 for f h.
Search results 31981 - 31990 of 37057 for f h.
State v. Penny P. Skaife
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), Stats. [2] The holding of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20-22 (1968
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14981 - 2005-03-31
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), Stats. [2] The holding of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20-22 (1968
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14981 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on the following newly discovered evidence, as outlined in his brief: 1) a sworn affidavit from Joseph F. Soulier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76556 - 2012-01-17
on the following newly discovered evidence, as outlined in his brief: 1) a sworn affidavit from Joseph F. Soulier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76556 - 2012-01-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 11, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of App...
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Paul F. Reilly, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28665 - 2007-04-10
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Paul F. Reilly, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28665 - 2007-04-10
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83136 - 2012-05-30
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83136 - 2012-05-30
State v. Rafeal D. Newson
in summarily denying Newson’s claim on this issue. F. Marquis’s Testimony. ¶26 Newson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19655 - 2005-09-19
in summarily denying Newson’s claim on this issue. F. Marquis’s Testimony. ¶26 Newson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19655 - 2005-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
with an attorney’s-fee award. See Wis. Stat. Rule 904.08.[3] See also Lohman v. Duryea Borough, 574 F.3d 163, 167
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89385 - 2012-11-19
with an attorney’s-fee award. See Wis. Stat. Rule 904.08.[3] See also Lohman v. Duryea Borough, 574 F.3d 163, 167
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89385 - 2012-11-19
State v. Nathan T. Moore
. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2001-02 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31
. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2001-02 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the release of this opinion, as “[f]ailure to comply with a requirement of the ‘rules is grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39620 - 2009-08-18
of the release of this opinion, as “[f]ailure to comply with a requirement of the ‘rules is grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39620 - 2009-08-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of the witnesses’ credibility. … [I]f the jury had seen the DVD evidence disproving Dailey’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134835 - 2015-02-09
of the witnesses’ credibility. … [I]f the jury had seen the DVD evidence disproving Dailey’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134835 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, will the presumption of effective assistance of counsel be overcome.” Id. (quoting Gray v. Greer, 800 F.2d 644, 646
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161245 - 2017-09-21
, will the presumption of effective assistance of counsel be overcome.” Id. (quoting Gray v. Greer, 800 F.2d 644, 646
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161245 - 2017-09-21