Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32241 - 32250 of 98342 for court records search online.

State v. James W. Knipfer
. On review of Knipfer’s Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion, the trial court reviewed the record, and found no support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25261 - 2006-05-24

[PDF] WI 42
of the circuit court, and limited portions of the record essential to an understanding of the issues raised
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50520 - 2014-09-15

Madison Gas and Electric Company v. 122 State Street Group
with the trial court that although there was lengthy testimony concerning how one recorder was removed and why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18719 - 2005-06-27

[PDF] Madison Gas and Electric Company v. 122 State Street Group
recognizes it could have done, that the trial court did not understand how the business-record data
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18719 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Bernard W. Harris
not included in the record. He also notes that one of the briefs submitted to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2757 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Steven C.
and that the court therefore erred by releasing his records. However, the DOC was not required to seek court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5051 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Steven C.
and that the court therefore erred by releasing his records. However, the DOC was not required to seek court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5049 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Steven C.
and that the court therefore erred by releasing his records. However, the DOC was not required to seek court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5050 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Matters which were not presented to the circuit court and made part of the record before that court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275825 - 2020-08-12

[PDF] William J. Schimmels v. John A. Noordover
supreme court confirmed the impact of a recorded plat on the rights of lot owners when it explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20710 - 2017-09-21