Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32251 - 32260 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] State v. Ronald J. Frank
with a child under the age of thirteen. The State filed a motion to introduce other acts evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3944 - 2017-09-20

State v. Scott A. Rudoll
motions, the first-degree charge was dismissed and the remaining counts were severed for trial. Rudoll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7183 - 2005-03-31

Laona State Bank v. State
priority lien status, resulting in a loss of $7,300. The trial court granted the State’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13053 - 2005-03-31

Harold C. Lane, Jr. v. Sharp Packaging Systems, Inc.
granting Niebler’s pretrial motion to dismiss Lane’s amended complaint. The court dismissed the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3720 - 2005-03-31

Wayne R. Purdy v. Cap Gemini America, Inc.
, 1997). ¶3 In 1999, Purdy brought a motion in the action from which he had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3447 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Patrick G.B.
proceedings. ¶7 On March 26, 1999, Cindy filed a motion to reconsider Judge Haughney’s oral pronouncements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2604 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Roger I. Abrahams
his postconviction motion. Abrahams claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4197 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
offenses and from an order denying his motion No. 2021AP2048-CR 2 for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603164 - 2022-12-20

John L. Yost v. State of Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation
they attributed to the highway construction. The DOT brought a motion in limine to prevent the Yosts from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9562 - 2005-03-31

Miro Tool & Mfg., Inc. v. Midland Machinery, Inc.
which granted Midland Machinery, Inc.'s motion to reopen a default judgment previously awarded to Miro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9790 - 2005-03-31