Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32251 - 32260 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 32251 - 32260 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues he is entitled to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30632 - 2007-10-15
of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues he is entitled to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30632 - 2007-10-15
[PDF]
State v. Brian J. Salentine
of the PSI. Before the rescheduled sentencing hearing, however, Salentine's attorney filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10122 - 2017-09-19
of the PSI. Before the rescheduled sentencing hearing, however, Salentine's attorney filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10122 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Miro Tool & Mfg., Inc. v. Midland Machinery, Inc.
. Miro Tool & Mfg., Inc. appeals from a nonfinal order which granted Midland Machinery, Inc.'s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9790 - 2017-09-19
. Miro Tool & Mfg., Inc. appeals from a nonfinal order which granted Midland Machinery, Inc.'s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9790 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
was insufficient to support the charges, that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for in camera review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141755 - 2015-05-13
was insufficient to support the charges, that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for in camera review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141755 - 2015-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to withdraw his guilty pleas, or alternatively, for resentencing. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212445 - 2018-05-08
motion to withdraw his guilty pleas, or alternatively, for resentencing. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212445 - 2018-05-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2022AP324 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Moche Lamar Greer, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028958 - 2025-10-28
). No. 2022AP324 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Moche Lamar Greer, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028958 - 2025-10-28
[PDF]
WI APP 139
appendix indicates that the letter was included as an exhibit at the June 25, 2010 motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70462 - 2014-09-15
appendix indicates that the letter was included as an exhibit at the June 25, 2010 motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70462 - 2014-09-15
State v. Patrick G.B.
26, 1999, Cindy filed a motion to reconsider Judge Haughney’s oral pronouncements. A hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2604 - 2005-03-31
26, 1999, Cindy filed a motion to reconsider Judge Haughney’s oral pronouncements. A hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2604 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and Michael Hoerchler (collectively, the Butzlaffs), 2 and an order denying his reconsideration motion. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225117 - 2018-10-30
, and Michael Hoerchler (collectively, the Butzlaffs), 2 and an order denying his reconsideration motion. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225117 - 2018-10-30
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Rudoll
motions, the first-degree charge was dismissed and the remaining counts were severed for trial. Rudoll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7183 - 2017-09-20
motions, the first-degree charge was dismissed and the remaining counts were severed for trial. Rudoll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7183 - 2017-09-20