Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3231 - 3240 of 7627 for yes.
Search results 3231 - 3240 of 7627 for yes.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
sentence you to. Do you understand that? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: All right. Do you still
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144256 - 2017-09-21
sentence you to. Do you understand that? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: All right. Do you still
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144256 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. In that colloquy, Reyes Mendez did not just offer “yes/no” answers to the court’s questions; rather, he made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032480 - 2025-11-05
. In that colloquy, Reyes Mendez did not just offer “yes/no” answers to the court’s questions; rather, he made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032480 - 2025-11-05
CA Blank Order
agreed the court should answer the special verdict question “yes” regarding whether the child had been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117453 - 2014-07-21
agreed the court should answer the special verdict question “yes” regarding whether the child had been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117453 - 2014-07-21
[PDF]
State v. David L. Geyer
the influence of an intoxicant. The answer is yes; therefore, the orders are affirmed. No. 98-3671-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14939 - 2017-09-21
the influence of an intoxicant. The answer is yes; therefore, the orders are affirmed. No. 98-3671-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14939 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert H. Wichman
"yes." From this, Wichman argues he was in custody at the time his statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11069 - 2005-03-31
"yes." From this, Wichman argues he was in custody at the time his statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11069 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert M. James
James argues that in this case the answer to the first inquiry is “yes” because the officer provided him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7652 - 2005-03-31
James argues that in this case the answer to the first inquiry is “yes” because the officer provided him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7652 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Berlin v. Jane M. Bartol
, and she said yes. Based upon this test result, Olson also cited Bartol for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7185 - 2017-09-20
, and she said yes. Based upon this test result, Olson also cited Bartol for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7185 - 2017-09-20
State v. Stephen Pritchard
had come from? A Yes, I did. He stated somewhere in Sussex. I asked him where in Sussex and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8478 - 2005-03-31
had come from? A Yes, I did. He stated somewhere in Sussex. I asked him where in Sussex and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8478 - 2005-03-31
State v. William Gunderson
understand your right to an attorney, and you’ve taken advantage of that, haven’t you? THE DEFENDANT: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4983 - 2005-03-31
understand your right to an attorney, and you’ve taken advantage of that, haven’t you? THE DEFENDANT: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4983 - 2005-03-31
Bockhorst v. David B. Kalan
. KALAN: Yes, I'd like to call myself. THE COURT: All right. Kalan, with the assistance of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8435 - 2005-03-31
. KALAN: Yes, I'd like to call myself. THE COURT: All right. Kalan, with the assistance of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8435 - 2005-03-31