Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32301 - 32310 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 32301 - 32310 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Scott A. Rudoll
motions, the first-degree charge was dismissed and the remaining counts were severed for trial. Rudoll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7183 - 2005-03-31
motions, the first-degree charge was dismissed and the remaining counts were severed for trial. Rudoll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as well. 3 On July 9, 2020, LaCrosse filed a motion for a three-judge panel in appeal No. 2020AP1121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898233 - 2025-01-07
as well. 3 On July 9, 2020, LaCrosse filed a motion for a three-judge panel in appeal No. 2020AP1121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898233 - 2025-01-07
COURT OF APPEALS
contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.67(1). He contends that the circuit court improperly denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41629 - 2009-10-06
contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.67(1). He contends that the circuit court improperly denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41629 - 2009-10-06
[PDF]
State v. Sandy Pegues
prejudicial. The decision whether to grant a motion for a mistrial lies within the sound discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9112 - 2017-09-19
prejudicial. The decision whether to grant a motion for a mistrial lies within the sound discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9112 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
from the order for reconfinement and the order denying his motion for sentence modification. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43675 - 2009-11-24
from the order for reconfinement and the order denying his motion for sentence modification. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43675 - 2009-11-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in denying his motion to suppress evidence on the ground that the arresting officer lacked reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201755 - 2017-11-09
in denying his motion to suppress evidence on the ground that the arresting officer lacked reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201755 - 2017-11-09
[PDF]
State v. Quentin L. Rogers
2 his motion for mistrial because, he contends, the prosecutor, in rebuttal closing argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14655 - 2017-09-21
2 his motion for mistrial because, he contends, the prosecutor, in rebuttal closing argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14655 - 2017-09-21
State v. Billye L. Massey
” convictions), and from a postconviction order summarily denying his motions for a new trial for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25064 - 2006-05-08
” convictions), and from a postconviction order summarily denying his motions for a new trial for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25064 - 2006-05-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for reconsideration.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043048 - 2025-11-26
motion for reconsideration.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043048 - 2025-11-26
Village of Menomonee Falls v. Paul G. Meyer
. Immediately before the trial, the Village discovered the missing police report. Meyer made a motion in limine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14758 - 2005-03-31
. Immediately before the trial, the Village discovered the missing police report. Meyer made a motion in limine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14758 - 2005-03-31