Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32381 - 32390 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32381 - 32390 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
. If the record “indicates that the court examined the facts of the case and reasoned its way to a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29151 - 2007-05-21
. If the record “indicates that the court examined the facts of the case and reasoned its way to a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29151 - 2007-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court did not adequately explain its reasons for imposing consecutive sentences. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2008-09-15
court did not adequately explain its reasons for imposing consecutive sentences. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2008-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of continuing CHIPS. Accordingly, I agree with the circuit court that in this case that JNOV on the continuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123010 - 2014-10-01
of continuing CHIPS. Accordingly, I agree with the circuit court that in this case that JNOV on the continuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123010 - 2014-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75193 - 2011-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75193 - 2011-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of the court. The circuit court in this case authorized its use in a postconviction proceeding to aid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92099 - 2013-01-29
of the court. The circuit court in this case authorized its use in a postconviction proceeding to aid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92099 - 2013-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶12 In the instant case, the trial court found that Rushing was competent to proceed. It made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29243 - 2007-06-04
). ¶12 In the instant case, the trial court found that Rushing was competent to proceed. It made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29243 - 2007-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 31, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138605 - 2015-03-30
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 31, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138605 - 2015-03-30
COURT OF APPEALS
In this case, the trial court stated that the testimony of the arresting officers and detectives was “wholly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39222 - 2009-08-10
In this case, the trial court stated that the testimony of the arresting officers and detectives was “wholly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39222 - 2009-08-10
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2020 WI 74 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP1154-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285680 - 2020-09-09
2020 WI 74 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP1154-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285680 - 2020-09-09