Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32431 - 32440 of 37736 for d's.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Iowa County: WILLIAM D. DYKE, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122956 - 2014-10-02

CA Blank Order
or pursue a possible Wis. Stat. § 971.06(1)(d) plea of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (NGI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131523 - 2014-12-16

Timothy J. Winters v. Linda Winters
of the petitioner-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Thomas D. Klein and Jennifer J. Van Kirk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17623 - 2005-05-24

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 29, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
the marriage not ended in annulment, divorce or legal separation. (d) The desirability that the custodian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52685 - 2010-07-28

Martin Riddell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
: Michael D. Guolee, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Schudson and Curley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13289 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
grams or less), contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(d)1. (2007-08),[1] entered on his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45594 - 2010-01-11

State v. Montgomery P. Avant
, trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to call these two other witnesses.[4] D. Appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6224 - 2005-03-31

State v. Larry Lamont Gatewood
was insignificant. State v. Sorenson, 143 Wis. 2d 226, 263-64, 421 N.W.2d 77 (1988). D. Evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3392 - 2005-03-31

State v. Armando P. Rodriguez
sexual assault as a habitual offender, in violation of §§ 940.225(2)(d) and 939.62(2), Stats.; criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13178 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
. 2 Cf. Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209, 217 (1982) (“[D]ue process does not require a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31146 - 2014-09-15