Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32511 - 32520 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32511 - 32520 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, for the Court to use the $400,000 plus (and again the Court is not sure this is accurate) would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110488 - 2014-04-21
in this case, for the Court to use the $400,000 plus (and again the Court is not sure this is accurate) would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110488 - 2014-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS
before his arrest in this case, nor did the trial court focus on the State’s inability to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100035 - 2013-07-29
before his arrest in this case, nor did the trial court focus on the State’s inability to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100035 - 2013-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 18, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47160 - 2010-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 18, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47160 - 2010-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
to reduce the complexity of the case for presentation to the court. It also noted that the services were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63774 - 2011-05-10
to reduce the complexity of the case for presentation to the court. It also noted that the services were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63774 - 2011-05-10
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 4, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47621 - 2010-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 4, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47621 - 2010-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. These are matters of law we review independently of the circuit court. Maryland Arms Ltd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82789 - 2012-05-22
in this case. These are matters of law we review independently of the circuit court. Maryland Arms Ltd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82789 - 2012-05-22
COURT OF APPEALS
that she was in a program through drug treatment court with regard to the pending cases against her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112167 - 2014-05-12
that she was in a program through drug treatment court with regard to the pending cases against her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112167 - 2014-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
was unsuccessful and the case went to trial. The trial court found in favor of Doocy and awarded her $1,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45802 - 2010-01-13
was unsuccessful and the case went to trial. The trial court found in favor of Doocy and awarded her $1,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45802 - 2010-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
to the particular case. Id. ¶19 Here, the record demonstrates that the circuit court considered all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32470 - 2008-04-16
to the particular case. Id. ¶19 Here, the record demonstrates that the circuit court considered all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32470 - 2008-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
, and was entitled to a judgment of foreclosure. The Court stated that it “is a fairly clear-cut case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124906 - 2014-10-22
, and was entitled to a judgment of foreclosure. The Court stated that it “is a fairly clear-cut case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124906 - 2014-10-22