Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32521 - 32530 of 41646 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 32521 - 32530 of 41646 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Windell Carradine
of conviction, following a jury trial, for armed robbery, second-degree reckless injury while armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11440 - 2017-09-19
of conviction, following a jury trial, for armed robbery, second-degree reckless injury while armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11440 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Tawanna H.
of fact in most cases involving § 971.29(2) will be a jury, usually the trier of fact, when § 938.263(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14028 - 2014-09-15
of fact in most cases involving § 971.29(2) will be a jury, usually the trier of fact, when § 938.263(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14028 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph F. Rizzo
of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16314 - 2017-09-21
of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16314 - 2017-09-21
Luis Santana v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
and asserted that the court had not given the proper jury instruction on that charge. Moreover, he claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20592 - 2006-01-24
and asserted that the court had not given the proper jury instruction on that charge. Moreover, he claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20592 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
State v. Lloyd Edwin Sellers
a judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty of first-degree intentional homicide while armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10976 - 2017-09-19
a judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty of first-degree intentional homicide while armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10976 - 2017-09-19
Honeycrest Farms, Inc. v. Brave Harvestore Systems, Inc.
judgment because the date of discovery is a question of fact for the jury. Honeycrest claims that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10628 - 2005-03-31
judgment because the date of discovery is a question of fact for the jury. Honeycrest claims that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10628 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pro se, appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776173 - 2024-03-20
pro se, appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776173 - 2024-03-20
COURT OF APPEALS
speedy-trial demand. A jury trial was scheduled for December 12, 2005. On December 7, 2005, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44860 - 2009-12-21
speedy-trial demand. A jury trial was scheduled for December 12, 2005. On December 7, 2005, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44860 - 2009-12-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by a jury from the facts ... even if an exculpatory inference could also be drawn ….” State v. Spears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252249 - 2020-01-09
by a jury from the facts ... even if an exculpatory inference could also be drawn ….” State v. Spears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252249 - 2020-01-09
[PDF]
State v. Renee L. Reek
appended to the criminal Wisconsin Jury Instructions state that the guiding principle in multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2541 - 2017-09-19
appended to the criminal Wisconsin Jury Instructions state that the guiding principle in multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2541 - 2017-09-19