Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3261 - 3270 of 3958 for davie.
Search results 3261 - 3270 of 3958 for davie.
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a finding of actual prejudice.” State v. Davis, 95 Wis. 2d 55, 60, 288 N.W.2d 870 (Ct. App. 1980). Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28760 - 2014-09-15
for a finding of actual prejudice.” State v. Davis, 95 Wis. 2d 55, 60, 288 N.W.2d 870 (Ct. App. 1980). Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28760 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Berrell Freeman v. Gerald Berge
on the brief of Stan Davis, assistant attorney general, and James E. Doyle, attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4631 - 2017-09-19
on the brief of Stan Davis, assistant attorney general, and James E. Doyle, attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4631 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Davis, J. ¶1 REILLY, P.J. Edward J. Ritger appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291217 - 2020-09-30
. Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Davis, J. ¶1 REILLY, P.J. Edward J. Ritger appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291217 - 2020-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Kevin D. James
the fair and efficient administration of justice. City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, 226 Wis. 2d 738, 749-50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18877 - 2017-09-21
the fair and efficient administration of justice. City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, 226 Wis. 2d 738, 749-50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18877 - 2017-09-21
Jeffrey Schwigel v. David J. Kohlmann
davis, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4193 - 2005-03-31
davis, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4193 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian S. Kortbein
against him. See Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 328 (1974); U.S. CONST. amend. XIV. He believes he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14086 - 2014-09-15
against him. See Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 328 (1974); U.S. CONST. amend. XIV. He believes he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14086 - 2014-09-15
Agnes E. Maciolek v. City of Milwaukee Employes' Retirement System Annuity and Pension Board
L. Nusslock and Daniel J. Borowski of Davis & Kuelthau, S.C. of Milwaukee. There was oral argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7505 - 2005-05-09
L. Nusslock and Daniel J. Borowski of Davis & Kuelthau, S.C. of Milwaukee. There was oral argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7505 - 2005-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
if it is “‘extraordinary in some bad way; glaring, flagrant.’” Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶21 n.8, 247 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80017 - 2012-03-26
if it is “‘extraordinary in some bad way; glaring, flagrant.’” Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶21 n.8, 247 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80017 - 2012-03-26
[PDF]
Shirley Krug v. Cathy S. Zeuske
of the substance of [the] legislation," the presumption of constitutionality does not apply. Davis v. Grover, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8336 - 2017-09-19
of the substance of [the] legislation," the presumption of constitutionality does not apply. Davis v. Grover, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8336 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the court’s discretion. State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶18, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823; see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987430 - 2025-07-23
for the court’s discretion. State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶18, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823; see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987430 - 2025-07-23