Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3271 - 3280 of 3958 for davie.
Search results 3271 - 3280 of 3958 for davie.
Jeffrey Schwigel v. David J. Kohlmann
davis, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4193 - 2005-03-31
davis, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4193 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
if it is “‘extraordinary in some bad way; glaring, flagrant.’” Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶21 n.8, 247 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80017 - 2012-03-26
if it is “‘extraordinary in some bad way; glaring, flagrant.’” Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶21 n.8, 247 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80017 - 2012-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the court’s discretion. State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶18, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823; see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987430 - 2025-07-23
for the court’s discretion. State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶18, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823; see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987430 - 2025-07-23
[PDF]
Michael J. Henry v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
. J. Weis of Habush, Habush, Davis & Rottier, S.C. of Rhinelander. COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14417 - 2014-09-15
. J. Weis of Habush, Habush, Davis & Rottier, S.C. of Rhinelander. COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14417 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Davis, J. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=322130 - 2021-01-13
Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Davis, J. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=322130 - 2021-01-13
H. Elaine Stipetich v. William J. Grosshans
by the alteration or elimination of a right or status previously recognized under state law. See Paul v. Davis, 424
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15443 - 2005-03-31
by the alteration or elimination of a right or status previously recognized under state law. See Paul v. Davis, 424
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15443 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. No. 2020AP62-CR 2 ¶1 REILLY, P.J. A sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402480 - 2021-07-30
. Before Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. No. 2020AP62-CR 2 ¶1 REILLY, P.J. A sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402480 - 2021-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. ¶1 REILLY, P.J. This consolidated appeal pits one group
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402815 - 2021-07-30
Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. ¶1 REILLY, P.J. This consolidated appeal pits one group
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402815 - 2021-07-30
State v. Latosha R. Armstead
homicide and a conviction on the separate predicate felony.” Id. at 439; see also State v. Davis, 144 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2515 - 2005-03-31
homicide and a conviction on the separate predicate felony.” Id. at 439; see also State v. Davis, 144 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2515 - 2005-03-31
State v. Neona C.
the erroneous exercise of discretion standard. See Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶19, 247 Wis. 2d 501
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6609 - 2005-03-31
the erroneous exercise of discretion standard. See Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶19, 247 Wis. 2d 501
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6609 - 2005-03-31