Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32941 - 32950 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 32941 - 32950 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Richard J. Wooster
980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B. Sentencing Discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B. Sentencing Discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
American Motors Corporation v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
bills and treatment, to investigate Chamblee's case. Chamblee filed a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8060 - 2005-03-31
bills and treatment, to investigate Chamblee's case. Chamblee filed a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8060 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in cases where the mortgaged premises sell for less than the amount due and to become due on the mortgage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97056 - 2013-05-20
in cases where the mortgaged premises sell for less than the amount due and to become due on the mortgage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97056 - 2013-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to see if the SPD would reappoint the former attorney to Sparks’s case after the suspension was lifted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
to see if the SPD would reappoint the former attorney to Sparks’s case after the suspension was lifted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the solicitation to intimidate the victim’s parents. On the State’s motion, this case was joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
on the solicitation to intimidate the victim’s parents. On the State’s motion, this case was joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
disagree and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The facts of the case are as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32694 - 2014-09-15
disagree and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The facts of the case are as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32694 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
(collectively “Zimmerman”) appeal an order regarding an award of attorney fees in a “lemon law” case. Zimmerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20
(collectively “Zimmerman”) appeal an order regarding an award of attorney fees in a “lemon law” case. Zimmerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
[PDF]
State v. Kyle J. Nelson
and PBT results, was the odor of intoxicant emanating from his vehicle. He argues that other cases have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18180 - 2017-09-21
and PBT results, was the odor of intoxicant emanating from his vehicle. He argues that other cases have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on February 20, 2014. In the second case appealed, Glinsey was charged as a repeater with being a party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05
on February 20, 2014. In the second case appealed, Glinsey was charged as a repeater with being a party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05