Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 3970 for davie.

Madison Teachers Inc. v. Madison Metropolitan School District
on the briefs of Kirk D. Strang and Alan G.B. Kim, Jr., Davis & Kuelthau, S.C., Madison. Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6172 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Alyson K. Zierdt of Davis & Kuelthau, S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31069 - 2008-01-29

State v. Colleen M. Novak
under Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 318 (1974), and State v. Thomas, 144 Wis. 2d 876, 893, 425 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20128 - 2005-11-01

[PDF] Alfred A. Zealy v. City of Waukesha
Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C.; Cameron Davis and National Wildlife Federation, Ann Arbor, MI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16878 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Michael J. Henry v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
. J. Weis of Habush, Habush, Davis & Rottier, S.C. of Rhinelander. COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14417 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Davis, J. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391954 - 2021-07-21

[PDF] WI APP 108
. Macy and Mark F. Yokom of Davis & Kuelthau, S.C., Oshkosh. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65357 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for the court’s discretion. State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶18, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823; see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987430 - 2025-07-23

State v. Terry Thomas
court did not directly question the defendant as to the factual basis for the plea). See also Davis v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17302 - 2005-03-31

Shirley Krug v. Cathy S. Zeuske
of [the] legislation," the presumption of constitutionality does not apply. Davis v. Grover, 166 Wis.2d 501, 520, 480
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8336 - 2005-03-31