Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33121 - 33130 of 44743 for part.
Search results 33121 - 33130 of 44743 for part.
State v. Torrence D. Goss
, which provides in part: (1) Before the court accepts a plea of guilty or no contest, it shall do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3059 - 2005-03-31
, which provides in part: (1) Before the court accepts a plea of guilty or no contest, it shall do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3059 - 2005-03-31
State v. David L. Kelly
with sexual intercourse. The supreme court has held that touching the private parts of another does not “so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3317 - 2005-03-31
with sexual intercourse. The supreme court has held that touching the private parts of another does not “so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3317 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald Waites
the order and deny the Knight petition ex parte. See Rule 809.51(2), Stats. Waites
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9966 - 2005-03-31
the order and deny the Knight petition ex parte. See Rule 809.51(2), Stats. Waites
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9966 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
considered a number of other factors. Marsh noted that when taking a questionnaire as part of his sex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31247 - 2007-12-17
considered a number of other factors. Marsh noted that when taking a questionnaire as part of his sex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31247 - 2007-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
was marital property and subject to division as part of divorce) (citing Damon v. Damon, 28 Wis. 510, (1871
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75146 - 2011-12-12
was marital property and subject to division as part of divorce) (citing Damon v. Damon, 28 Wis. 510, (1871
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75146 - 2011-12-12
State v. Antwan Battles
co-conspirator which would have given rise to such belief on the part of the defendant that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10871 - 2005-03-31
co-conspirator which would have given rise to such belief on the part of the defendant that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10871 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnny M. Lacy
it against her. ¶6 As part of his defense to the sexual assault charges, Lacy testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3946 - 2005-03-31
it against her. ¶6 As part of his defense to the sexual assault charges, Lacy testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3946 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
proceedings. Attorney Hicks received transcripts from parts of C.B.'s case in July 2008 but took no action
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78004 - 2012-02-09
proceedings. Attorney Hicks received transcripts from parts of C.B.'s case in July 2008 but took no action
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78004 - 2012-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
elements are satisfied: “(1) action or non-action, (2) on the part of one against whom estoppel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103690 - 2013-11-04
elements are satisfied: “(1) action or non-action, (2) on the part of one against whom estoppel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103690 - 2013-11-04
Paras Reddy v. Town of Belmont
approval in May of 1996. On June 11, 1996, the Town adopted a moratorium which stated in relevant part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13512 - 2005-03-31
approval in May of 1996. On June 11, 1996, the Town adopted a moratorium which stated in relevant part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13512 - 2005-03-31